Template:Did you know nominations/Shrine of Miosach

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Desertarun (talk) 08:19, 7 July 2021 (UTC)

Shrine of Miosach

Shrine of Miosach, late 11th and early 16th centuries
Shrine of Miosach, late 11th and early 16th centuries
  • ... that large parts of the 11th century Irish Shrine of Miosach (front pictured) were added during a 16th-century refurbishment? Source: Stalley, Roger. "Irish Art in the Romanesque and Gothic Periods". In: Treasures of early Irish art, 1500 B.C. to 1500 A.D: From the collections of the National Museum of Ireland, Royal Irish Academy, Trinity College Dublin. NY: Metropolitan Museum of Art, 1977. p. 187. ISBN 978-0-8709-9164-6

Created by Ceoil (talk). Self-nominated at 23:14, 27 June 2021 (UTC).

Interesting artwork, covered in detail on fine sources, mostly offline and accepted AGF, no copyvio obvious. The image is licensed and almost a must. The hook is fine! - In article and image caption or hook, it should become clearer which parts exactly were added, because for a while I understood that all we see pictured was 16th century. - Suggestions for the article which you can follow or not:
  • The first sentence is too long for my taste.
    • Done
  • I didn't understand "leaves from a Gospel" right away, - prefer the later "extract".
    • Done
  • If you go for GA, perhaps move the background from the lead to the body, and have only a summary of it in the lead.
  • The standard-bearer is not mentioned in the body, and has no ref in the lead. - That might be also good for a hook, btw.
  • The sequence of images in the description might be reversed, to show the "old" first.
  • In the now first, I see no Madonna with child.
    • clarified. ps, this image comes first because it shows the cross in the center, and the two of the 4 M~&C's (in reply to the sequence of images point above)
  • Is a museum a plural word, requiring "their"?
  • For the discussion of a translation, it would be nice to have the Latin also. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 14:32, 29 June 2021 (UTC)
    • ya, looking around. Ceoil (talk)
    • Thanks Gerda, working on these. If I find more on the standard-bearer aspect, will propose an ALT hook. Ceoil (talk) 19:56, 1 July 2021 (UTC)
      Thank you so much! I you want a different hook, I'll look again, but this is fine with me. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 21:02, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
      Great. Will ping you back here (prob tomorrow night) when happy all of the above have been sorted. Ceoil (talk) 22:22, 2 July 2021 (UTC)