Template:Did you know nominations/Robin Lee Wilson

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by feminist (talk) 16:32, 5 February 2018 (UTC)

Robin Lee Wilson[edit]

Moved to mainspace by Dumelow (talk). Self-nominated at 08:43, 17 December 2017 (UTC).

Article is new enough and long enough. Hook is correctly formatted and interesting with an inline cite in the article. No picture to review. Article is neutral and well referenced. No copyvios detected. It's good to go. Philafrenzy (talk) 13:35, 20 December 2017 (UTC)
  • Hi, I came by to promote this, but have some questions about the hook. On the surface, it seems to be talking about a religious society; is your intention to produce an Easter egg hook? The hook is also focusing on the organization rather than the subject's own accomplishments. And if this position is noteworthy, why isn't it mentioned in the lead? Yoninah (talk) 20:25, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
It's paviours as in paving. He's in construction and engineering. The company of paviours was established in 1479 as one of the guilds of medieval London. Philafrenzy (talk) 20:50, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
  • @Philafrenzy: Oh. Well, this is very obscure for someone from outside England. Yoninah (talk) 21:18, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
If only there was somewhere we could look it up! Philafrenzy (talk) 21:50, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
Hi Yoninah, I expanded the article lead to cover this. The hook could mention livery company if it helps, but I think that might make it overly long. The revision of its ordinances was carried out when he was the master (like a chairman) of the company - which were originally trade guilds but are now effectively charitable organisations. If you want, I can take another look at the article if an alternative hook is necessary - Dumelow (talk) 22:46, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
  • @Dumelow: Yes, please do. I think the hook should focus on the subject, not what the organization did. Yoninah (talk) 22:48, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
That seems a little long and overly technical to me. Perhaps the following? - Dumelow (talk) 16:54, 14 January 2018 (UTC)
  • Thank you, I think that's much better. Since I suggested the hook, calling on another reviewer to sign off on ALT3. Pinging @Philafrenzy:. Yoninah (talk) 17:15, 14 January 2018 (UTC)
Good to go with ALT3, 188 length checks ok, interesting. Thanks, Zeete (talk) 18:27, 4 February 2018 (UTC)