Template:Did you know nominations/Philcade Building

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Hawkeye7 (talk) 21:38, 15 August 2014 (UTC)

Philcade Building[edit]

Philcade(Amoco North Building) in downtown Tulsa

Created by Bruin2 (talk). Self nominated at 15:46, 17 July 2014 (UTC).

  • Is it Philtower Building, or Buildings? The hooks conflict. EEng (talk) 07:09, 19 July 2014 (UTC)
It is Philtower Building. I revised the link in ALT2 to make this a little clearer, although the previous link would have taken you to the correct page via a redirect. Bruin2 (talk) 22:37, 20 July 2014 (UTC)

The article is new enough, long enough, and does not violate policy. The main hook is properly cited and short enough. ALT1 is properly sourced but is five characters too long. ALT2 is short enough but uses a citation that is independent but not necessarily reliable. The photo is Creative Commons. The nominator did a QPQ three days after another editor performed the same QPQ, so I'm not sure that should count. Chris Troutman (talk) 05:09, 6 August 2014 (UTC)

Thanks for your review. I propose removing one clause "Villa Philbrook," from ALT1 to meet the character limit:
ALT 3 :... that Waite Phillips built the Philcade Building (pictured) penthouse as a residence after he and his wife donated their mansion to the city of Tulsa to become the Philbrook Art Museum?
:I also have done other QPQs, listed on my home page. Please look at Template:Did you know nominations/United States Custom House (San Ysidro, California) or Template:Did you know nominations/Ivy Parker, to see if these address your concerns.

QPQ is good. ALT 3 is short enough and is properly sourced, which were the only remaining issues. Chris Troutman (talk) 16:12, 6 August 2014 (UTC)