Template:Did you know nominations/Mōretsu Uchū Kōkyōkyoku Dai 7 Gakushō "Mugen no Ai"

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by BlueMoonset (talk) 02:25, 17 December 2012 (UTC)

Mōretsu Uchū Kōkyōkyoku Dai 7 Gakushō "Mugen no Ai"[edit]

  • Comment: I'm a new nominator (0 DYK credits at the moment), I haven't reviewed any articles yet.

Created/expanded by Moscowconnection (talk). Self nom at 05:30, 10 December 2012 (UTC)

  • Article itself is fine in terms of length, newness, and neutrality. I can read Japanese, so can verify the sources. Image has proper fair use rationale. The main problem is with the hook. It is certainly interesting, and the sources confirm the basic fact that Friedman participated in the recording, but the hook is deceptive. Friedman did not leave Megadeth in order to participate in this single--which itself is not the anime Bodacious Space Pirates, but only its theme song. I would suggest a more honest, but still hooky alternative like:
Michitaro (talk) 03:05, 16 December 2012 (UTC)
How about this alternative:
--Moscow Connection (talk) 03:43, 16 December 2012 (UTC)
I had thought of that myself, but thought the "only to" again restricted the meaning, implying that that's the main thing he did after leaving Megadeth. Michitaro (talk) 16:13, 16 December 2012 (UTC)
My alternative can be interpreted as that Marty Friedman left the American heavy metal scene, moved to Japan and now works with some "strange people". Which is true. He has covered AKB48, worked with DJ Ozma and now is in a Momoiro Clover Z cover heavy metal band named Metal Clone X. If you still don't think my alternative is acceptable, I will agree to your alternative version. Mine is more hooky, though. --Moscow Connection (talk) 17:46, 16 December 2012 (UTC)
Thanks, I understand your point--that is why I did think of "only to" as well. In the end, I think it's fine to err a bit on the side of hookiness, in the spirit of DYK. So this is OK to go using ALT2. Michitaro (talk) 21:39, 16 December 2012 (UTC)