Template:Did you know nominations/Lowbridge Estate

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Allen3 talk 21:26, 30 August 2015 (UTC)

Lowbridge Estate[edit]

Created by Philafrenzy (talk). Self-nominated at 20:51, 27 July 2015 (UTC).

  • New and long enough. All non lead paragraphs have inline citations. Checks for copyvio reveals no problems.
Matters that need to be resolved are 1) content of the hook is not backed by an inline citation to a reliable source at the end of the sentence in the article that has the content (as per WP:WIADYK section 3b), and 2) A QPQ review needs to be performed (confirmed). North America1000 18:36, 29 July 2015 (UTC)
I have put an additional ref in. I will do a QPQ shortly. Philafrenzy (talk) 20:25, 29 July 2015 (UTC)
@Philafrenzy: Pinging nominator to remind of withstanding QPQ. ~ RobTalk 12:35, 10 August 2015 (UTC)
QPQ done. Thanks. Philafrenzy (talk) 22:41, 10 August 2015 (UTC)
Pinging Northamerica1000; ready for another look. ~ RobTalk 15:58, 12 August 2015 (UTC)
  • Reviewer needed to check new hook source citations and submitted QPQ. BlueMoonset (talk) 22:20, 17 August 2015 (UTC)
The following has been checked in this review by Maile
  • QPQ by Philafrenzy
Eligibility
  • Article created by Philafrenzy on July 27, 2015 and has 1,796 characters of readable prose
  • Article is NPOV, currently stable, no edit wars, no dispute tags
Sourcing
  • Every paragraph sourced inline, online
  • No bare URLs, and no external links used as inline sources
Hook
  • Hook is 80 characters, NPOV, stated in the article and sourced at the end of the sentence 1
  • No image in the hook
Tools
  • Duplication Detector on all online sources found no copyvio or close paraphrasing.
Everything passes DYK criteria as stated above. G2G.— Maile (talk) 21:14, 28 August 2015 (UTC)