The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by SL93 (talk) 23:34, 31 March 2022 (UTC)
Overall: I understand that lists are not normally eligible for DYK (though I cannot see that in the guidelines?), and the article title "Judy Ann Santos filmography" implies a list, and indeed the article page does contain a list. However, there is enough discussion of Santos' life and work in the interesting and readable introduction, which has over 3,000 characters. Therefore I believe that this article is eligible for DYK. What is more, the introduction really did make me want to see some of the films, which surely makes this a valid entry. So in my opinion, this nom is good to go. Storye book (talk) 11:54, 21 March 2022 (UTC)
.jpg)
I understand that lists are not normally eligible for DYK (though I cannot see that in the guidelines?), and the article title "Judy Ann Santos filmography" implies a list, and indeed the article page does contain a list. However, there is enough discussion of Santos' life and work in the interesting and readable introduction, which has over 3,000 characters. Therefore I believe that this article is eligible for DYK. What is more, the introduction really did make me want to see some of the films, which surely makes this a valid entry. So in my opinion, this nom is good to go. Storye book (talk) 11:54, 21 March 2022 (UTC)