Template:Did you know nominations/Hurricane response
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:32, 22 October 2018 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Hurricane response[edit]
- ... that hurricane responders face hazards from floodwater such as chemical and biological contaminants and electrocution? Source: [1] pp. 7, 14
- Reviewed: Max Jessner
Created by John P. Sadowski (NIOSH) (talk). Self-nominated at 02:00, 29 September 2018 (UTC).
The article is new enough and long enough. QPQ present. The hook is interesting and timely (given two major hurricanes recently), even if the article is not the most interesting. It provides general overview of what hurricane response is. I think the hook source is fine as official material, though it should be noted it comes from the NIOSH. A very nice density of citations helps support the comprehensive, yet comparatively succinct, nature of the article. Well done. Raymie (t • c) 21:40, 14 October 2018 (UTC)
- Thanks for the review. For the record, here are some additional non-NIOSH sources that support the hook: [2] [3] [4]. John P. Sadowski (NIOSH) (talk) 01:06, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
