Template:Did you know nominations/Harold Horton Sheldon

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by PFHLai (talk) 02:19, 18 December 2015 (UTC)

Harold Horton Sheldon[edit]

  • ... that the scientist Harold Horton Sheldon wrote as early as 1929 about the serious possibility of one day man visiting other planets through the use of rockets?

Created by Doug Coldwell (talk). Self-nominated at 11:40, 24 November 2015 (UTC).

  • Comment Review under way. 7&6=thirteen () 12:14, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
  • DYK checklist template
General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation

Image eligibility:

QPQ: Done.

Overall: Passes DYK checklist.

  • Review Good to go! New article, timely nominated. Meets core policies and guidelines, and in particular: is neutral; cites sources with inline citations; is free of close paraphrasing issues, copyright violations and plagiarism. DYK nomination was timely and article is easily long enough. Every paragraph is cited, and the hook is directly and extensively supported by the NY Times obituary, to wit: "Dr. H. H. Sheldon, a physicist, dies". The New York Times. New York City. December 24, 1964. Retrieved November 21, 2015. In 1929, for instance, he discussed in print the possibility of man's one day visiting other planets.. No copyright violations or too close paraphrasing. In passing, I note that I did not have access to the offline sources and WP:AGF. Earwig's copy violation detector: Harold Horton Shelton report gives it a clean bill. Hook is hooky enough, I think, and relates directly to the essence of the article. It is interesting, decently neutral, and appropriately cited. QPQ done. 7&6=thirteen () 13:00, 24 November 2015 (UTC)