Template:Did you know nominations/Filial piety in Buddhism

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Yoninah (talk) 21:13, 10 September 2019 (UTC)

Filial piety in Buddhism

Śyāma, a well-known story about filial piety in Buddhism
Śyāma, a well-known story about filial piety in Buddhism
  • ... that Buddhist teachings on filial piety (illustrated) say it is nearly impossible to repay the gratitude owned to parents, because it is that much? Source:"Parents, in fact, do so much for their children that it is almost impossible to repay them adequately" (Ohnuma 2012, pp. 11–12)
    • ALT1:... that some Buddhists believe that all people have once been their parents in a previous life, and that liberating people from suffering is therefore a form of filial piety (illustrated)? Source:"Buddhism considers all kinds of service and help to sentient beings as filial piety. This is because Buddhism does not think of death as the end of life but as a change of form. ... Sentient beings wonder [sic] in the realm of samsara from the beginningless time until now, so that all other sentient beings may have been one's parents in past lives." (Xing 2013, p.18)
    • ALT2:... that some Buddhists prostrate for their parents out of filial piety (illustrated)? Source: "Bowing to statues of the Buddha or to Buddhist monks is fairly ubiquitous amongst Buddhists of all denominations. The practice of bowing to parents, by contrast, is only practised by some types of Buddhists ..."(Thanissaro 2015, pp.1–2)

Improved to Good Article status by Farang Rak Tham (talk). Self-nominated at 20:05, 15 August 2019 (UTC).

  • The article was promoted to GA status in time. I assume good faith on the offline references. A QPQ has been completed. The image is free use. The article doesn't explicitly have the original hook, but I am approving ALT1 or ALT2. SL93 (talk) 16:26, 10 September 2019 (UTC)