The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:55, 12 October 2015 (UTC)
Review Good to go! Three-in-one nomination. Three new articles, that just went live and were moved from User: Doug Coldwell's sandbox. Meets core policies and guidelines, and in particular: is neutral; cites sources with inline citations; is free of close paraphrasing issues, copyright violations and plagiarism. DYK nomination was timely and all articles are easily long enough. Every paragraph is cited. Hook references are verified and cited to a multiplicity of sources. Earwig's copy violation detector reports gives them all a clean bill. Hook is hooky enough, I think, and relates directly to the essence of the articles. It is interesting, decently neutral, and appropriately cited. 3 QPQs done. Congratulations and nicely done! 7&6=thirteen (☎) 03:16, 2 October 2015 (UTC)