Template:Did you know nominations/Constitutional Court of the State of Berlin

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by starship.paint (exalt) 23:20, 5 March 2023 (UTC)

Constitutional Court of the State of Berlin

(

• Back to T:TDYK
• Article history

)

Kammergericht building that houses the court

• ... that the Constitutional Court of the State of Berlin voided the 2021 Berlin state election and ordered today's repeat election? Source: Deutsche Welle and FAZ (last one in German)
  • ALT1: ... that the Constitutional Court of the State of Berlin (building pictured) voided the 2021 Berlin state election and ordered a repeat election? Source: Same as above
  • Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Pulaski's Masterpiece
  • Comment: The original hook will only work if it is on the front page on 12 February 2023, which might be a bit optimistic - but I would like to try. Therefore it would have to go to the "Special occasion holding area".

Created by WatkynBassett (talk). Self-nominated at 20:40, 29 January 2023 (UTC). Note: As of October 2022, all changes made to promoted hooks will be logged by a bot. The log for this nomination can be found at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Constitutional Court of the State of Berlin, so please watch a successfully closed nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.

General: Article is new enough and long enough
New enough: Long enough:

Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Adequate sourcing: Neutral: Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing:

Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
Cited: Interesting:

Image: Image is freely licensed, used in the article, and clear at 100px.
Freely licensed: Used in article: Clear at 100px:

QPQ: Done.

Overall: A concise yet no less neatly put together article about an interesting institution going through some interesting history. I have assumed good faith for the sources in German, which I do not read, but I will add that they are all to sources that seem quite reliable, and I know that the publisher of the frequently cited Reutter source, Springer, is definitely a reliable press. The hook is interesting, it's cited in the article, the image is clear and has appropriate Creative Commons licensing, and QPQ has already been completed. I would encourage those managing moving hooks and assembling sets to consider getting this in place for February 12, 2023 so that the original hook can be used, as that would be a nice little bonus. Hydrangeans (she/her | talk | edits) 01:16, 30 January 2023 (UTC)