Template:Did you know nominations/Childcare infection
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Hawkeye7 (talk) 06:53, 6 September 2014 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Childcare infection[edit]
- ... that infection in childcare is a risk when groups of children meet for school or daycare, but hygiene reduces its prevalence?
- ALT1:... that children in school or day care are at risk for infection in childcare, but risk is decreased with hand washing?
- Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Ko e Iki he Lagi
Created by Bluerasberry (talk). Self nominated at 16:56, 11 July 2014 (UTC).
- From a brief look at the article I worry that the term childcare infection is a neologism -- it doesn't occur in the title of any of the cited sources. If I'm wrong the nominator will easily be able to shore that up in the article text and sourcing. EEng (talk) 16:14, 12 July 2014 (UTC)
- EEng I changed the name to "Infection in childcare" per WP:NEOLOGISM. Because there is no term for this, many phrases are used, and I listed them at Talk:Infection_in_childcare. "Infection in childcare" appears more than "childcare infection", so that must be a better name. I am not sure of the best name but I tried to choose something appropriate. Blue Rasberry (talk) 17:49, 12 July 2014 (UTC)
- I'd like other editors to look at Talk:Infection in childcare and opine. EEng (talk) 17:59, 12 July 2014 (UTC)
- I read the page and the talk page. Infection in childcare doesn't make sense. Infection control in child care makes more sense, or Spread of infectious diseases in child care, though that's too long. Yoninah (talk) 22:47, 5 August 2014 (UTC)
- User:BlueMoonset has changed the template name to Childcare infection, but the page has not been moved and the hooks have not been rewritten or re-linked. Yoninah (talk) 22:28, 13 August 2014 (UTC)
- I read the page and the talk page. Infection in childcare doesn't make sense. Infection control in child care makes more sense, or Spread of infectious diseases in child care, though that's too long. Yoninah (talk) 22:47, 5 August 2014 (UTC)
- I'd like other editors to look at Talk:Infection in childcare and opine. EEng (talk) 17:59, 12 July 2014 (UTC)
- Yoninah, the template page has always been named "Childcare infection", which is the name the article started with when moved to mainspace on July 11. DYK template pages are never supposed to be moved when the corresponding article is moved; there are instead certain edits that should be made. After it was nominated, the article was moved on July 12 to Infection in childcare, and the hook here adjusted accordingly, but nothing else about the template. Today, I changed the DYK nompage links and DYKmake sub-templates to reflect the article's current name, as is the preferred practice, and should have been done back on July 12. If the article is moved again to one of the names you suggested last week, these two sub-templates, plus the link in the hook, will need to be adjusted again to reflect the new article name. BlueMoonset (talk) 23:20, 13 August 2014 (UTC)
Reviewer needed for this nomination. Yoninah (talk) 11:22, 14 August 2014 (UTC)
- Sorry for making a burden of this. I have other choices listed at Talk:Infection_in_childcare. As a clear but long description, how about transmission of infectious diseases in the child-care setting? There is no confusing that, it definitely is not a neologism, and it is used in some literature. Blue Rasberry (talk) 15:28, 14 August 2014 (UTC)
- Yoninah, the template page has always been named "Childcare infection", which is the name the article started with when moved to mainspace on July 11. DYK template pages are never supposed to be moved when the corresponding article is moved; there are instead certain edits that should be made. After it was nominated, the article was moved on July 12 to Infection in childcare, and the hook here adjusted accordingly, but nothing else about the template. Today, I changed the DYK nompage links and DYKmake sub-templates to reflect the article's current name, as is the preferred practice, and should have been done back on July 12. If the article is moved again to one of the names you suggested last week, these two sub-templates, plus the link in the hook, will need to be adjusted again to reflect the new article name. BlueMoonset (talk) 23:20, 13 August 2014 (UTC)
This is good to go and should have been approved ages ago. Precisely what we call the article doesn't affect its eligibility for DYK. Hooks are fine, article is new enough and long enough, source is offline but the facts are common sense. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 21:52, 5 September 2014 (UTC)