Template:Did you know nominations/Cairns child murders

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Allen3 ^talk 12:43, 3 January 2015 (UTC)

Cairns child murders[edit]

(

)

... that eight children were killed in a suburban home of Cairns, Australia, in December 2014?

Reviewed: Intention
Comment: A ~~soon-to-be-~~failed ITN nomination, which I opposed.

Created by Deadsetdaniel (talk), Everymorning (talk), Kristijh (talk). Nominated by George Ho (talk) at 22:54, 19 December 2014 (UTC).

@George Ho: New enough, meets core content policies. However, it's well under 1500 characters (about 1100). --Jakob (talk) 01:36, 20 December 2014 (UTC)

@Jakec: I know that. Give the article more time to be expanded. The event is current and may rapidly develop further. George Ho (talk) 01:52, 20 December 2014 (UTC)
~~The article is currently 1,516 prose bytes. Perhaps further expansion is needed. --George Ho (talk) 03:24, 20 December 2014 (UTC)~~
~~Never mind; it is five bytes short of minimum. George Ho (talk) 19:42, 20 December 2014 (UTC)~~
Oh great. Due to WP:BLPCRIME, a suspect's name is omitted, reducing content to 1,322 prose bytes. --George Ho (talk) 03:48, 22 December 2014 (UTC)

I must say I am not keen on this being in DYK really.....Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 06:28, 28 December 2014 (UTC)

I'm reading the talk page, and the involved parties support inclusion of the suspect's name. --George Ho (talk) 06:48, 28 December 2014 (UTC)

I think I probably support the names but I my reluctance is to have this at DYK. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 10:37, 28 December 2014 (UTC)

The article currently passes the 1,500-character minimum. Why not letting it? --George Ho (talk) 19:40, 28 December 2014 (UTC)

No point holding this up further, IMO. Hook directly cited to RS. Good to go. --Jakob (talk) 19:52, 28 December 2014 (UTC)