The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by SL93 (talk) 14:03, 9 November 2022 (UTC)
Overall: Tintor2 (talk) 22:37, 31 October 2022 (UTC)
@DigitalIceAge: The article was properly created and possesses enough weight. Still, the hook might come across as hard to understand for the general reader while there are some few red links that might need to be removed.Tintor2 (talk) 22:37, 31 October 2022 (UTC)
Just a note that per Wikipedia:Red link, red links to plausible new articles should not be removed - Dumelow (talk) 07:26, 4 November 2022 (UTC)
Hi @Tintor2: thanks for the review! Just pinging to let you know my QPQ requirement has been fulfilled. DigitalIceAge (talk) 00:19, 5 November 2022 (UTC)
Adding missing approval. SL93 (talk) 02:07, 8 November 2022 (UTC)
Tintor2 (talk) 22:37, 31 October 2022 (UTC)
@DigitalIceAge: The article was properly created and possesses enough weight. Still, the hook might come across as hard to understand for the general reader while there are some few red links that might need to be removed.Tintor2 (talk) 22:37, 31 October 2022 (UTC)
