Talk:Zimbabwe Rhodesia

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Southern Zambezia[edit]

Is it "Zimbabwe Rhodesia" or "Zimbabwe-Rhodesia"? Alr 01:57, 23 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Rhodesiancoatofarms.GIF[edit]

Image:Rhodesiancoatofarms.GIF is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 02:33, 6 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Rhodesiancoatofarms.GIF[edit]

Image:Rhodesiancoatofarms.GIF is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 22:06, 24 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Zimbabwe Rhodesia Stamps?[edit]

As far as I can recall, no overprinted stamps were issued in the brief life of the Zimbabwe Rhodesia state; Rhodesia stamps were replaced by stamps with Zimbabwe.

I cannot cite references to this 'omission' (there would be none of course if there were no overprints!) but I lived there and was a philatelist at the time, so was very conscious about stamps, I suggest the reference to the overprints be removed unless there can be a citation to validate it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Publisher100 (talkcontribs) 02:05, 31 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The updated reference regarding Zimbabwe Rhodesia stamps is still inaccurate, as far as I can tell. Can someone provide citations indicating there were forgeries of Zimbabwe Rhodesia stamps? I think there were forgeries of the original UDI era overprints but that is another time and another situation. In fact, Rhodesia stamps were used right through the Zimbabwe-Rhodesia period, replaced with definitives with Zimbabwe after independence in 1980. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.206.177.41 (talk) 04:19, 27 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

"biracial rule"[edit]

This term is a misnomer, since it implies that whites and blacks now lead in conjunction. Even without the POV stance that whites now are disenfranchised (pretty undeniable), a less POV wording would be majority rule or something similar. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.0.209.200 (talk) 03:34, 31 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 6 May 2015[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Move. Cúchullain t/c 17:44, 12 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Zimbabwe-RhodesiaZimbabwe Rhodesia – The constitution of Zimbabwe Rhodesia did not include a hyphen (or, indeed, the prefix "Republic of"—it seems the country was just "Zimbabwe Rhodesia"). See scan here. Thank you to User:Anegada for bringing this to light. —  Cliftonian (talk)  07:35, 6 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Hyphenated name[edit]

I recall the name of the country being hyphenated, though it appears that this practice was only by foreign media, which I have cited in the article. Polemicista (talk) 19:45, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

"Marxist liberation movements referred to as "terrorists""[edit]

'Terrorists' shouldn't be hyphenated, as these "liberation movements" WERE terrorists - they bombed and murdered many innocent civilians. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 142.68.105.175 (talk) 02:09, 8 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]