Talk:Yuvan Shankar Raja

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

WikiProject class rating[edit]

This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as start, and the rating on other projects was brought up to start class. BetacommandBot 20:06, 9 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

First Tamil song to enter top 20 in India is Yuvan Shankr Raja's Thuli THuli mazhai in paiya[edit]

First Tamil song to enter top 20 in India is Yuvan Shankar Raja's Thuli Thuli Mazhai in paiya. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.43.75.113 (talk) 23:53, 11 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links[edit]

Currently there are external links to the following websites: yuvanshankarraja.net and yuvanworld.com. Are they official websites of the artist or just some fan websites? Arfaz (talk) 00:21, 28 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:YuvanSR.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion[edit]

An image used in this article, File:YuvanSR.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Copyright violations
What should I do?

Don't panic; deletions can take a little longer at Commons than they do on Wikipedia. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion (although please review Commons guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.
  • If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Commons Undeletion Request

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 13:10, 6 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Yuvan Shankar Raja Cafe Coffee Day 05.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion[edit]

An image used in this article, File:Yuvan Shankar Raja Cafe Coffee Day 05.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: All Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status

What should I do?

Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used.
  • If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 09:11, 26 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Yuvan-shankar-raja1.jpg Nominated for Deletion[edit]

An image used in this article, File:Yuvan-shankar-raja1.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests January 2012
What should I do?

Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.

To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:Yuvan-shankar-raja1.jpg)

This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 12:00, 26 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Moving to his current name from the old name[edit]

Hi, Please move this article to Ex. yuvaan shankar raja's current official name Muhammad Khaliq Yuvan. Wasif (talk) 14:16, 3 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, not it's not his new name. Who told you so? Indiaglitz.com? Do you think that's a credible source? After his conversion, he had a release Vanavarayan Vallavarayan in which his name has been credited as Yuvan Shankar Raja only. So, don't believe everything Indiaglitz tells, it's not true! Veera Dheera Sooran (talk) 14:57, 3 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
We cannot build WP articles with OR facts. Please add a proper source where the same old name was used in his recent release Vanavarayan Vallavarayan.Wasif (talk) 15:36, 3 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Yuvan Shankar Raja's accepting Islam[edit]

Hi User:Veera Dheera Sooran, I am in verge of 3RR in Yuvan Shankar Raja page and not going to revert as you do it blindly. Please answer to below questions on your reverting of my edits in that page.

  1. Yuvan Shankar Raja has converted to Islam or not? Why there is not a single mention about it?
  2. Why do you continously delete the news of his accepting Islam which i added with the sources from Times oF India and India today.? (Still i can provide 100s of sources that Yuvan accepted Islam) and after deleting the sources content, you call me vandal.!!! Please explain your deletion of the sourced fact of Yuvan's accepting Islam.
  3. Where did you find that Indiaglitz is not a source? and why did you mislead in the revert summary by deleting TOI and IndiaToday sources??( 100s of sources are available in google)
  4. What is the controversy in his name? If there is really a controversy, please add both sides of that controversy with appropriate sources and let teh readers know the actual controversy. Only that will be a WP:NPOV Instead what is the use of simply vandalizing and deleting.?
  5. See WP:5, articles need to have all the relevent information. Please avoid taking a high handed biasing to hide facts in WP article, please be open to discussion and help build a constructive WP.

Still if you choose to simply delete the sourced information i have no other choice but refer the matter to admins and proceed with whatever necessary and applicable.Wasif (talk) 15:06, 3 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I am not denying anything, there is a mention of that in the page, look here please: Yuvan Shankar Raja#Personal life. There you have the TOI source dude! First go through the article before you make edits! Indiaglitz.com is surely not a 100% reliable source. Give me a source where Yuvan himself says "My name henceforth will be XYZ" like actress Monica (actress) said and it will be accepted. It is NOT his name, and if YOU change somebody's name, that with out any reliable sources, it is controversial! And this is not bias but the truth. And please go on and inform the admins, that will make things much easier for all of us. Veera Dheera Sooran (talk) 15:12, 3 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Lets close one by one. First, Since you are not denying his accepting Islam, please add that in the lead since the name is misleading with his current status, with the source of India today, TOI which i added there and you reverted calling vandalism.

Second, Regarding his new name, indiaglitz is sure a reliable source. But still if you are looking for a better source i will add it before i change the name. Or If you claim if there is a controversy as you left a message in my page, please add both sides of the controversy for a better Neutral article. Wasif (talk) 15:32, 3 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

In which universe is Indiaglitz reliable? Did you notice that no other source has reported anything like this? He has not changed his name, that's the fact. Did you see the Vanavarayan Vallavarayan album cover, which released AFTER his conversion, it still has his name as Yuvan Shankar Raja, that's the ultimate proof. I repeat, unless he himself states that he has changed his name to XYZ, his name is Yuvan Shankar Raja and this will remain as it is. And this is related to his personal life, so it is included under the "Personal life" section where it belongs to, as simple as that. There are no claims about his marriages in the lead either. Veera Dheera Sooran (talk) 16:04, 3 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
All news articles and television announcements still mention him as Yuvan Shankar Raja. Being in cinema industry, it will be just few hours needed for Managers to convey the name change and enforcing it in announcements, but still it hasn't been done. So, his name is still Yuvan Shankar Raja officially. - Vatsan34 (talk) 05:11, 8 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Agreed with you Vatsan34. But here (http://www.nytimes.com/movies/person/1766716/Mohammed-Khaliq-Yuvan) i have a reliable source. So adding both sides of it.Wasif (talk) 14:06, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
@ Veera Dheera Sooran , hope again you Would not ask "In which universe is NewYorkTimes a reliable source"?? Wasif (talk) 14:10, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
It doesn't state anything man! It is not meant for Indian cinema! It is not complete and it has wrong information. Look they have this site too: http://www.nytimes.com/movies/person/1522837/Yuvan-Shankar-Raja. No, that's not enough! I want to see Yuvan himself stating "I have changed my name. My new name is XYZ", that's the reliable source I expect. Nothing less will be accepted! But the fact is, you will not find such a source anywhere in the world. Don't you think if a popular personality like Yuvan had changed his name it would be widely reported in all leading sites and newspapers? Hard luck dude! Don't waste your time with this! Veera Dheera Sooran (talk) 22:27, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
NO Mr. Veera Dheera Sooran. The NYT page which i added is pointing only to Yuvan. It is in all leading news papers. FYI, his official facebook page too is changed to his new name.
Regarding,No, that's not enough! I want to see Yuvan himself stating "I have changed my name. My new name is XYZ", that's the reliable source I expect. Alas. WP doesn't say that. If it is so, for Millions of pages in WP in the names of personalities are unsourced and will be invalid to have pages in that name without a person saying My name is XYZ.. will be against WP. Wasif (talk) 14:06, 17 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • That nytimes link above is not reliable for the concerned claim, in fact it is junk. There are specific exemption from 3RR in BLP articles. --Jyoti (talk) 14:33, 17 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Where did you find or how do you say that its a junk? Please mention here.Till then i am not reverting. Wasif (talk) 15:04, 17 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Dude, that NYT link doesn't state or prove anything! It's not even a news article or a report! It is neither complete nor correct! It is either computer generated or works like IMDb where users can submit material, which is NOT considered reliable! But that's all you could find in the whole wide web, isn't it? I repeat, if a popular personality like Yuvan had changed his name it would be widely reported in all leading sites and newspapers. It was not mentioned in a single notable site, ergo it hasn't happened, period! Veera Dheera Sooran (talk) 15:17, 17 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Personal life section[edit]

Hi, User:NeilN removed the sourced content without any citation and re-inserted some filthy words from local tamil languages like thevdiya paya, loose etc. When i pointed out, the user chose to STOP inserting those filthy words but still keeps on deleting the entire content saying some reasons. The intention of the user is evident from the user's repeated deltion of the source itself and re-inserting filthy words twice.I am not editing the page since i am in verge of WP:3RR.
@ User:NeilN, Please be clear as to which line you say is not from teh source. Instead do not keep deleting and you violate the WP:3RR and vandalise the article by removing the source. Discuss here. This forum is open for all issues. If you chode to abstain from discussion the lines would be added back with a referal note to admin page since all the lines there are well sourced.
@User:NeilN,

  1. Why did you re-insert filthy Tamil words twice? (Sock puppet)
  2. Why do you remove the source itself? (Vandalism)
  3. which line is not there, and why do you refrain from mentioning it and are keen in removing the entire para and source?Wasif (talk) 15:43, 26 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
@Wasif: As I am removing a made up quote from a BLP, my reverts fall under WP:3RRNO.
  1. I reverted in the words once because I had no idea what you were talking about. All I saw was you re-adding a huge unsourced quote into the lede. My second revert was followed up by the removal of the objectionable words. Do not assume everyone knows Tamil.
  2. Read WP:NOTVAND (for the third time). Your source does not contain your first attempt at a quote.
  3. Regarding your second attempt, the very first words "When my mom died" do not appear in the source. I stopped checking after that. As I said on my talk page, quote properly and accurately. --NeilN talk to me 16:06, 26 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]


User:NeilN,

  1. . Ok. But next time onwards be cognizant of what you are inserting and what you are reverting.
  2. No. Does that authorize you to delete the source?
  3. Its against WP standards to exactly copy paste the same words as found in the source. It should be re written for better reading. So your utterance as the very first words "When my mom died" do not appear in the source. I stopped checking after that clearly shows that you expect a copy paste from the source. I can nevr do that. Go through the source carefully once and you will find every matter there.
  4. If you are really interested in building this article, Rephrase the sentence and add it rather than simply saying false and lame reasons to delete. Wasif (talk) 15:06, 9 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@Wasif:

  1. Be more cognizant of WP:SOCK and WP:NOTVAND before you try to cite sockpuppetry and vandalism.
  2. Yes, when the source doesn't back up the quote.
  3. Look at what you're writing, "Regarding his accepting Islam Yuvan said," followed by text written in the first person. This implies it is a direct quote. We do not change direct quotes.
  4. I personally don't think any of that should be in the article as there's no indication how it impacts what the subject is notable for. But if someone else wants to add it, giving it proper weight and not misquoting, then I won't argue. --NeilN talk to me 16:10, 9 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
IMO, NeilN is right, the content is inaccurate and undue. Wasif should stick to content discussion rather than repeatedly commenting on editor conduct, if you wish report editor to ANI instead of derailing article talk page discussion. --AmritasyaPutra✍ 12:30, 10 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 5 external links on Yuvan Shankar Raja. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 02:20, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Yuvan Shankar Raja. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 15:22, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Yuvan Shankar Raja. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:46, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 19 external links on Yuvan Shankar Raja. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:42, 5 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Yuvan Shankar Raja. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:48, 14 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 2 February 2022[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: reverted undiscussed move - SUN EYE 1 07:13, 2 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yuvan Shankar Raja (Abdul Haliq) → Yuvan Shankar Raja – Name in partheses is non-primary/non-stage name. See here: "When asked by a leading daily if he would be referred to as Abdul in film credits, Yuvan said," I have no plans to change 'Yuvan Shankar Raja' in the credit roll of films because many feel it's a brand and cannot be changed". DareshMohan (talk) 06:24, 2 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Creating a new page for Yuvan Shankar Raja's discography[edit]

The article is too long and complicated. It would be better if someone could start a new page for Yuvan Shankar Raja's filmography Nkb 21 (talk) 07:05, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Move discussion in progress[edit]

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Yuvan Shankar Raja's Discography which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 22:49, 17 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Career[edit]

Anyone please update recent works of yuvan. His other language movies after panja and after 2015 his works in tamil movies, rowdy baby song hit, his indipendent song works, 25 years of yuvan, and about vijay yuvan collaboration in thalapathy68 202.21.42.164 (talk) 09:14, 27 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@
@DareshMohan 202.21.42.164 (talk) 09:26, 27 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

2021 to present[edit]

someone please add detailed article about Yuvan's musical hit movies like Maanaadu,Viruman, Naane Varuven, Love Today.

@Manick22 Ramsayramsamy (talk) 19:30, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Yuvan_Shankar_Raja&oldid=1209080967"