Talk:WrestleMania XL

Cancelled Match

Why is this even a segment? Other than to be able to discuss the Vince/Brock thing on the Mania page? Every year theres cancelled matches. And esepecially since the PPV hasnt even happened yet, seems really odd to do. Seems like its really only there to serve as a vehicle to discuss the Vince allegations and to call attention to that Brock was involved too.

Requested move 9 October 2022

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved. The move suggestion itself seems to not be opposed. However, several people want to redirect the article, but that's out of scope for the RM process. Use AfD to discuss redirection. (closed by non-admin page mover) — Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung, mellohi! (投稿) 19:22, 23 October 2022 (UTC)

---

WrestleMania 40 → WrestleMania XL – With the name and logo of this WrestleMania revealed, I am requesting that this article is moved to WrestleMania XL. Bleacher Report has an article with a corresponding tweet from Jon Alba depicting the logo which uses the Roman numerals for 40 as opposed to the Arabic numerals used in the nine WrestleManias that precede the 40th iteration of the event. Jay Coop · Talk · Contributions 05:06, 9 October 2022 (UTC) — Relisting. — Shibbolethink ^{(♔ ♕)} 17:50, 16 October 2022 (UTC)

• Redirect instead Its almost two years away, better to redirect it to the WrestleMania article.★Trekker (talk) 12:11, 9 October 2022 (UTC)

• Support It may be a year and a half or so away (not 2 years), but this has been confirmed by WWE with the official unveiling of the graphic for the 40th WrestleMania. 2601:405:4000:1F50:20EB:7833:B564:1919 (talk) 09:00, 10 October 2022 (UTC)

Note: WikiProject Professional wrestling has been notified of this discussion. — Shibbolethink ^{(♔ ♕)} 17:50, 16 October 2022 (UTC)

Relisting comment: to generate a clearer consensus. — Shibbolethink ^{(♔ ♕)} 17:50, 16 October 2022 (UTC)

• Redirect - not really suitable for an article yet. But, yes, move once close enough for a suitable article to be made. Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 18:45, 16 October 2022 (UTC)

  @Lee Vilenski the article already exists. You're replying on its talk page. JDC808 ♫ 03:52, 18 October 2022 (UTC)

  I'm aware of that. I'm saying redirect both pages to WrestleMania. This is not yet suitable for a page. Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 08:01, 18 October 2022 (UTC)

  @Lee Vilenski there was a past discussion in the project that said once location and date info are confirmed, then article can be made. All of that info has been announced. JDC808 ♫ 12:39, 19 October 2022 (UTC)

  A project discussion doesn't surplant WP:GNG. Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 15:45, 19 October 2022 (UTC)

  @Lee Vilenski okay, but there's enough coverage in reliable sources to meet the notability guidelines. JDC808 ♫ 03:12, 20 October 2022 (UTC)

• Redirect per Trekker and Lee. Presently there's nothing in this article other than the default templates we put on every PPV page. Consequently, I can't see how this justifies its own article. — Czello 08:08, 18 October 2022 (UTC)

• Keep and Support Move A confirmed venue and more importantly logo for a future wrestlemania is enough justification for an article to be established at this point, IMO. DrewieStewie (talk) 06:35, 19 October 2022 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Return of Norman Smiley

With the return of Norman Smiley revealed, I am requesting that this article is moved to WiggleMania XL. 2603:7080:403E:562:B1A8:EC86:51BC:9ECB (talk) 02:10, 31 December 2023 (UTC)

Cody

Are we sure Cody is gonna face Reigns again? 197.87.135.46 (talk) 14:48, 28 January 2024 (UTC)

Yes, the match was confirmed during the post rumble press conference 2600:8804:6900:79A:963:31A2:7B5C:3837 (talk) 16:02, 28 January 2024 (UTC)

Looks like you were mistaken. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 197.87.143.252 (talk) 20:26, 30 January 2024 (UTC)

nah he wasn't lmfao WrestleLuxury Wiki (talk) 12:47, 9 February 2024 (UTC)

I'm sure you're very happy about that, mark. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 197.87.63.11 (talk) 13:06, 11 February 2024 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 28 January 2024

Roman Reigns (c) with Paul Heyman vs. Cody Rhodes singles match the [ Undistputed WWE Universal Championship]] 216.175.29.71 (talk) 16:28, 28 January 2024 (UTC)

 Already done RWILD✉ 18:29, 28 January 2024 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 28 January 2024 (2)

216.175.29.71 (talk) 16:41, 28 January 2024 (UTC)

 Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. RWILD✉ 18:27, 28 January 2024 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 3 February 2024

Removal of Cody vs Seth, has not been confirmed , sited or proven on any source 104.36.175.105 (talk) 03:24, 3 February 2024 (UTC)

 Not done: The page's protection level has changed since this request was placed. You should now be able to edit the page yourself. If you still seem to be unable to, please reopen the request with further details. Sincerely, Guessitsavis (she/they) (Talk) 20:30, 4 February 2024 (UTC)

Cody Rhodes content

JDC808 - please stop adding content that fails verification from the cited source. starship.paint (RUN) 07:09, 3 February 2024 (UTC)

1. Fightful never says While Rhodes's choice seemed obvious, this is simply your interpretation and editorializing.
2. Dot Net does not say Seth "Freakin" Rollins, who Rhodes had defeated in his return match at WrestleMania 38, made a convincing argument as to why Rhodes should instead challenge him for Raw's World Heavyweight Championship, stating that his title was the workhorse championship and the title that Dusty would choose. You restored that but instead Dot Net says Seth Rollins ... implied that he knows which title Dusty Rhodes would want.
3. Dot Net does not say Rhodes said that he would eventually win the WWE Championship, but you added that.

This is just shoddy editing. starship.paint (RUN) 07:09, 3 February 2024 (UTC)

@Starship.paint literally everything you pointed out is in the sources (with a minor exception of Rhodes defeating Rollins at WM38). This is a failed interpretation of sources on your part (we're not supposed to copy exactly what sources say, that would be plagiarism).

1. Read the quoted text from Cody at the Fightful source. "seemed obvious" sums up his entire quote, and additionally, going off what was mentioned before in this summary about Cody wanting the WWE Championship, that implies which title he would go for (i.e., "seemed obvious").

2. Dot Net says Seth "knows which title Dusty would want". What I put is saying the same thing without repeating exactly what Dot Net wrote.

3. The whole promo between Rhodes and Reigns was whether or not Rhodes would choose to challenge Reigns for Reigns' title (which consists of the WWE Championship). Dot Net says "He then told Roman he was coming for him, but not at WrestleMania". That's Rhodes saying he is not challenging Roman for the title at WrestleMania, but would eventually. JDC808 ♫ 07:28, 3 February 2024 (UTC)

I'm sorry JDC808, we simply disagree on how much liberties to take with sources. You're more lenient and I'm more strict in these listed instances. We should work out a consensus wording. Or just find a source that more closely matches your wording. starship.paint (RUN) 07:32, 3 February 2024 (UTC)

Proposing content based on the above sources:

1. At the press conference after the Royal Rumble, Rhodes said: "I want to be back in the ring with Roman Reigns and I want to finish the story." Fightful says: At the WWE Royal Rumble Post-Show Press Conference, Steve Fall of WrestlingNewsCo asked Rhodes whether he would officially say that he was choosing Reigns as his opponent at WrestleMania ... "... I want to be back in the ring with Roman Reigns and I want to finish the story ..."
2. Seth Rollins argued that Rhodes should instead face him for his World Heavyweight Championship, stating that his title was the workhorse championship and "the Dusty Rhodes title"; Rhodes responded that he would consider it. Dot Net. Meanwhile, if we want to mention that Rhodes defeated Rollins at WM38, just get a recent source for it, I am not opposed but RS has to say it as relevant.
3. On the February 2 episode of SmackDown, Rhodes said that he would not challenge Roman Reigns at WrestleMania XL. If you read the sources, both primary WWE.com and secondary Dot Net F4W The West Australian that's what they say. I'm not sure why we are not allowed to mention Roman. starship.paint (RUN) 07:28, 3 February 2024 (UTC)

@Starship.paint

1. The press conference doesn't add anything of value to include in a match summary for a match that isn't happening (that match being Reigns vs. Rhodes). This is why "seemed obvious" was the chosen wording. It also eliminates mentioning Roman Reigns since Reigns is not who Cody is facing. There are times we might need to mention someone that's not in the match, but this match summary can be done without mentioning Reigns.

2. Although it's in quotations, I don't think we should be calling it the "Dusty Rhodes title" as that's inaccurate. Yes, Seth said that in his promo, but it was metaphorical speak (there are already folks out there who think Seth's title is the previous WHC and even the WCW/NWA title, lets not confuse them more). Counter: "Seth "Freakin" Rollins argued that Rhodes should instead face him for Raw's World Heavyweight Championship, stating that his title was the workhorse championship that embodied Dusty" (or something along those lines that signifies it's the championship that Dusty would want).

3. Essentially covered in point 1, but this match is not about Cody vs. Reigns (at one point perhaps, but not anymore, unless WWE changes plans again). I wouldn't be opposed to mentioning something in Background before Storylines on how WWE have had to change plans, such as due to Punk's injury since he was originally reported to be Seth's WM opponent. JDC808 ♫ 07:55, 3 February 2024 (UTC)

• • @JDC808: - for #1 and #3 perhaps consider this perspective. The storyline section informs readers how we got the match. Cody's match will come due to him choosing one wrestler, which could happen because he rejects one wrestler. So, by covering his choice (rejecting Reigns), we are accurately telling readers how the match came about. The storyline reason given was that he wanted Reigns to lose everything, not just the title. For #2, that roughly sounds okay, I am looking for sources for inclusion. starship.paint (RUN) 08:13, 3 February 2024 (UTC)

    @Starship.paint yes, the storyline section does tell us that. His goal has always been the WWE Championship. The summary I was trying to implement told us his original goal and how we got to his choice without mentioning Reigns. Whenever we get a confirmation of Rock vs. Reigns, we can make a mention about why Cody rejected Reigns there, since his rejection essentially set up Rock vs. Reigns (and that goes back to what I said where at times we might need to mention someone not in the match). I guess for now we could mention it, but rework it once Rock vs. Reigns is confirmed. JDC808 ♫ 08:23, 3 February 2024 (UTC)

    • @JDC808: - while Cody's goal is indeed the WWE Championship, at least during the last promo he also mentioned Reigns himself: I am coming for you Roman Reigns. Seems like possibly a secondary goal. Seems like we have to disagree, I do not see any way that we can properly tell all of Cody's story without mentioning Reigns. Yes, there should be some reworking when Rock/Reigns is confirmed. starship.paint (RUN) 08:29, 3 February 2024 (UTC)

• • While it seemed likely that Rhodes would challenge for the Undisputed WWE Universal Championship, Seth "Freakin" Rollins instead called for Rhodes to challenge him for his World Heavyweight Championship, arguing that his title was the workhorse championship that embodied Dusty Rhodes. CBS / USA Today / Dot Net. starship.paint (RUN) 08:36, 3 February 2024 (UTC)

Remove The Rock vs Roman Reigns

This is not 100% official. 2600:1006:B054:ACD:6C22:EE1C:B8CE:A35D (talk) 20:12, 3 February 2024 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 4 February 2024

Add a matchup Roman Reigns vs the Rock. It's on WWE's official Instagram

https://www.instagram.com/p/C24_2o4M38l/ BXC7 (talk) 04:20, 4 February 2024 (UTC)

 Not done: JTP ^{(talk • contribs)} 04:57, 14 February 2024 (UTC)

Do not add until wwe announce official

do not create wrestling tribalism here with useless edit war. Do not add seth Rollins to Cody Rhodes match and not add roman and rock match as this your personal page. Its public information needs to be backed by authentic and official source. Yugendar bcom (talk) 12:40, 4 February 2024 (UTC)

Thank you. Agreed. Kvwiki1234 (talk) 05:03, 6 February 2024 (UTC)

Section about Cody saying he won't challenge Reigns at WrestleMania and The Rock showing up

This keeps getting hidden. It seems pretty significant and worthy of inclusion to me, especially with the press conference coming up, even if the match isn't officially confirmed yet. Rambo Apocalypse (talk) 21:56, 4 February 2024 (UTC)

Request to make this page Extended Confirmed Protected

This page should be extended confirmed protected. There seems to be a lot of incorrect edits ranging from inaccurate fan speculation to flat out vandalism, especially in the Matches table.

I move to make this page to extended confirmed protected category, editable only by extended confirmed users.

Thanks,

Kvwiki1234 (talk) 03:29, 8 February 2024 (UTC)

that's crazy bro WrestleLuxury Wiki (talk) 12:49, 9 February 2024 (UTC)

You should make a request at WP:RPP — Czello ^(music) 12:51, 9 February 2024 (UTC)

Main event matches and undercard matches

In the production section it says that Rhea Ripley vs Becky Lynch and Iyo Sky vs Bayley are undercard matches. It also says that Roman Reigns vs Cody Rhodes and Seth Rollins vs Drew McIntyre are main event matches. Has it been confirmed which matches are the undercard and which matches are the main event? (Fran Bosh (talk) 18:44, 24 February 2024 (UTC))

I agree. Seems like a snub to the women's world title matches. Kvwiki1234 (talk) 04:02, 29 February 2024 (UTC)

LA Knight vs AJ Styles

Why it not mentioned 197.86.195.143 (talk) 15:17, 25 February 2024 (UTC)

Has not been officially confirmed by WWE yet. Kvwiki1234 (talk) 04:02, 29 February 2024 (UTC)

Yes it has. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 197.87.143.112 (talk) 04:23, 16 March 2024 (UTC)

It had not yet been officially confirmed by WWE at the time of Kvwiki1234's reply. Vincent Forrester (talk) 02:24, 23 March 2024 (UTC)

Oh, yes it had. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 197.87.143.8 (talk • contribs)

Cancelled match

The Brock Lesnar match that was supposedly cancelled was never advertised or promoted by WWE, and is only included based on pure speculation, so there is no reason to have it here. Dr. Cool Beans (talk) 17:17, 25 February 2024 (UTC)

Agreed. Change made.  Done Kvwiki1234 (talk) 04:07, 29 February 2024 (UTC)

Still listed as a cancelled match. Man was never promoted for Royal Rumble, Elimination Chamber or Wrestlemania. Funny how he is listed with multiple matches based off a tabloids podcast. Probably just for slander. 2600:1700:2F90:9280:6558:E5C0:356A:9510 (talk) 21:57, 27 March 2024 (UTC)

Is Uncle Dave considered a "reliable source" according to Wikipedia standards? lol Kvwiki1234 (talk) 13:51, 29 March 2024 (UTC)

Yes, per WP:MELTZER. — Czello ^(music) 15:50, 29 March 2024 (UTC)

The one thing Cornette, Prichard, Russo, Bischoff, Hogan, Nash, Dusty(RIP), Ole(RIP), Undertaker and Ventura could all agree on is that Meltzer lies blatantly, posts falsehoods as "verified facts", and when his lies are exposed he refuses to admit that he was wrong. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 197.83.246.171 (talk) 13:20, 4 April 2024 (UTC)

I am not surprised that pro wrestlers (who notoriously don't like dirtsheets) and people notorious for hot takes don't like Meltzer. However, we don't decide reliability based on the opinions of those who might have a grudge against someone whose job it is to talk about things they might not want talking about. — Czello ^(music) 13:30, 4 April 2024 (UTC)

Or people who have worked within a business for decades don't like the idea of someone who has never worked within that industry, and is completely ignorant of the workings of the industry, declaring themselves to be an "expert" even while being wrong more than right. Meltzer's takes on major events show that he has less than no idea how the business actually works, and even other non-industry people like Mike Johnson have exposed how utterly inaccurate and biased Meltzer truly is. If Meltzer is an "expert" on pro wrestling, then we may as well declare some gun-collecting survivalist Neo-Nazi with a website to be an "expert" on World War II — Preceding unsigned comment added by 197.83.246.171 (talk) 16:11, 4 April 2024 (UTC)

It's simply incorrect to state that Meltzer is ignorant of the inner workings of the industry given that he is, by far, the most renowned pro wrestling historian to have lived. Please see WP:MELTZER for the extensive discussion on this that has already taken place; if you want to dispute his status as an RS you'll have to make an argument that hasn't already been made. — Czello ^(music) 16:21, 4 April 2024 (UTC)

"Most renowned" according to who? Actual wrestling historians speak extensively to people who have worked in the business, study old documents etc. Meltzer is an opinionated fanboy who gives "star ratings". Meltzer makes statements about people in the wrestling business without actually speaking to the people he is making the statements about. He has been exposed as a liar, but refuses to acknowledge he was ever wrong. Considering the effort people like Tim Hornbaker put into their writings, it's disgraceful to equate them with Meltzer. Let alone say that Meltzer is the "most renowned". They're not called "dirt sheets" for nothing. Meltzer is the National Enquirer of Pro Wrestling, and always has been. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 197.83.246.171 (talk) 18:50, 4 April 2024 (UTC)

The usual hate for Meltzer. Has been discussed several times, most recently WP:MELTZER. Can we move forwad? We can't have the same discussion every few weeks. --HHH Pedrigree (talk) 20:12, 4 April 2024 (UTC)

It's not "hate for Meltzer". It's holding a constant standard for what qualifies as proper journalism. Could you imagine an equivalent of Meltzer being used as a "reliable source" or "expert" in any other field, whether it be history, baseball, movies, or any other environment? Of course not. Meltzer is a hack. Clearly biased and prejudiced. Has posted false information multiple times. And never admits error. Do the people in the industry, whether it be Vince McMahon(yes, I know...), John Cena, Randy Orton, or key figures from the past such as Hulk Hogan, Eric Bischoff or Kevin Nash, hold Meltzer in the same regard or esteem as key figures in football think of football journalists? Of course not. Meltzer is a joke to them. He's clearly someone who is a figure of irritation(for all his misinformation and inaccuracies being accepted by gullible fans), and/or a figure of fun. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 197.83.246.171 (talk) 06:02, 5 April 2024 (UTC)

If you read the discussion at WP:MELTZER you'll see these points have been addressed. Ultimately 1) he's used as a reliable source by other reliable sources, including mainstream media, 2) making errors does not negate reliability, as every reliable source has made errors, some many more (such as the BBC), and 3) what wrestlers think of Metlzer is irrelevant, as they are WP:PRIMARY figures. These aren't new arguments and the Wikiproject has overwhelmingly decided he's reliable. — Czello ^(music) 13:56, 5 April 2024 (UTC)

You mean you have. And are you saying that if Meltzer says one thing, and someone IN the business says the opposite, then wiki considers Meltzer more reliable???

No, I haven't - if you read the link I provided you'll see the community at large decided this. And yes, in your example Meltzer would take priority. The other figures are WP:PRIMARY sources. This is how Wikipedia works. — Czello ^(music) 07:27, 6 April 2024 (UTC)

Regardless of whether or not Meltzer is a reliable source, the standard for what should be considered a

cancelled match should simply be whether or not it was advertised/promoted by the company itself, ie the matches featuring Sasha Banks and Naomi being cancelled after they walked out, because it was advertised by the venue and promoted on tv earlier that night. If Lesnar hasn't even been mentioned by the company in regards to Wrestlemania, there is no reason to list him here. Dr. Cool Beans (talk) 21:49, 4 April 2024 (UTC)

Well, I have no problem to include Lesnar due to the magnitude of the scandal. Some movies, for example, include possible casting or cancelled ideas for the script. --HHH Pedrigree (talk) 15:58, 5 April 2024 (UTC)

I think if we do include it, it should be by attribution. As in, "X reported this match was going to take place, but..." — Czello ^(music) 16:07, 5 April 2024 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 3 March 2024

For wrestlemania you night one ypu shoupd put down the rock and roman reigns vs cody rhodes and seth rollins 2603:7080:BA01:3661:7536:A72B:E026:B534 (talk) 14:57, 3 March 2024 (UTC)

 Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. --TheImaCow (talk) 21:37, 3 March 2024 (UTC)

It's not officially a match yet, so it should be listed. Additionally, WWE has not announced for ANY of the matches if they will be on night 1 or night 2, so the whole matches list is not correct. 198.0.123.172 (talk) 19:32, 5 March 2024 (UTC)

Poster

Should we keep the current poster with just Cody & Roman or add the updated one featuring Rock and Rollins? Troutfarm27 ^(Talk) 04:32, 9 March 2024 (UTC)

We should use the poster for the event itself, instead, should we not? Vincent Forrester (talk) 01:17, 13 March 2024 (UTC)

Last Chance Match

Roman stipulated on the latest edition (8th March) of Smackdown that if Cody loses, he won't be able to challenge for the title again:

"When I beat you at Wrestlemania on Sunday, that's it. [...] You don't get another shot."

The card section of the article should be changed to reflect this. 2.25.38.54 (talk) 13:09, 10 March 2024 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 12 March 2024

"Additionally, due to Rock's position on the TKO board of directors, he stipulated that the Undisputed WWE Universal Championship match would be a last chance match where if Rhodes did not win, he would never be able to challenge Reigns for the title again."

"Reigns" was not specified. If Cody Rhodes loses against Roman Reigns, he will never be able to challenge for the Undisputed WWE Universal Championship ever again no matter who holds it. Furthermore, under "Last Chance match" in "Professional wrestling match types" (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Professional_wrestling_match_types#Last_Chance_match), it is stated that "Another similar situation will also occur at WrestleMania XL, in which if Cody Rhodes loses against Roman Reigns, he will never be able to challenge for the Undisputed WWE Universal Championship ever again no matter who holds it." This contradicts this page. Vincent Forrester (talk) 03:30, 12 March 2024 (UTC)

@Vincent Forrester honestly, WWE needs to further clarify this. The source for the Reigns vs. Rhodes match in the matches table has not been updated to reflect this stipulation (nor has the tag match one), so it may not even be an actual stipulation. Hopefully we'll get clarification when Rock shows up on SmackDown this week. JDC808 ♫ 02:12, 13 March 2024 (UTC)

P.S. I removed the mention at Last Chance match. It was added by a random IP and was unsourced anyways. We at least have a source here that Rock said that. We just need WWE to clarify if it's an actual stipulation. JDC808 ♫ 02:15, 13 March 2024 (UTC)

My understanding is that the championship-related statements (Cody's last chance, WHC disappearing) are things that Rock is supposedly planning to make happen, not stipulations. Vincent Forrester (talk) 04:58, 13 March 2024 (UTC)

It doesn't matter what your understanding is. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 197.87.143.8 (talk) 06:49, 23 March 2024 (UTC)

My understanding is based on what WWE have, themselves, explicitly stated. Much of the information in this page is purely speculative. Vincent Forrester (talk) 18:53, 24 March 2024 (UTC)

As per this statement, now that I am able to edit this page myself, I have done so to reflect this detail. Vincent Forrester (talk) 19:08, 24 March 2024 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 21 March 2024

Requesting to revert the most recent change to this page.

I see no reason for the poster for the main event of Saturday to take precedence over the poster for the main event of Sunday, and thus the main event of WrestleMania XL as a whole.

If this change is denied, requesting to correct the grammar underneath the poster, as there are no spaces after commas. Vincent Forrester (talk) 10:47, 21 March 2024 (UTC)

 Done — Czello ^(music) 10:51, 21 March 2024 (UTC)

Cancelled Matches

The cancelled matches segment should really be removed. Its not done for other PPVs. And none of these matches were ever officially announced. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.235.134.235 (talk) 16:37, 21 March 2024 (UTC)

@98.235.134.235 we actually have included such things on previous ones (not every single past article, but it has been included on some). And we should actually include this kind of info. These are entertainment productions after all. Look at movies or TV shows. They note how there are changes to filming, etc. and this is very much in that same vein. JDC808 ♫ 07:00, 23 March 2024 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 23 March 2024

Change participants in Ladder Match from “Street Profits” and “A-Town Down Under” to…

“Street Profits [or A-Town Down Under] vs. New Catch Republic [or Legado Del Fantasma]” 72.28.6.238 (talk) 06:00, 23 March 2024 (UTC)

 Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. PianoDan (talk) 23:05, 9 April 2024 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 23 March 2024 (2)

Your wrong as to who advanced in the tag team tournament for mania.. check your facts !

That is all 207.38.59.180 (talk) 10:12, 23 March 2024 (UTC)

 Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. Rusty4321 ^{talk contribs} 05:33, 5 April 2024 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 31 March 2024

Can we have someone add the Andre the Giant Memorial Battle Royal and the (thus far) announced participants to the TBA section?

Cedric Alexander Ashante “Thee” Adonis Kit Wilson Elton Prince Cameron Grimes Veer Sanga Julius Creed Brutus Creed Ivar Akira Tozawa Otis JD McDonagh Apollo Crews Andrade Ricochet Chad Gable Bronson Reed Shinsuke Nakamura Omos

https://www.wrestlezone.com/news/1459389-multiple-names-confirmed-for-andre-the-giant-memorial-battle-royal-on-4-5-wwe-smackdown

Golbez01 Golbez01 (talk) 13:12, 31 March 2024 (UTC)

 Not done: We typically don't detail the battle royal unless it takes place at WrestleMania itself. Instead it's recorded on its own article. — Czello ^(music) 13:20, 31 March 2024 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 1 April 2024

Hello! Please add the 6 Man Philadelphia Street Fight Tag Match between The Pride (Lashley & Street Profits) and The Final Testament as it was recently announced! 96.224.200.215 (talk) 23:30, 1 April 2024 (UTC)

 Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. Rusty4321 ^{talk contribs} 05:33, 5 April 2024 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 7 April 2024

Damian priest beat drew but it should say this is his money in the bank cash in 2600:1700:2529:DC20:7429:D3EC:3B9B:C384 (talk) 23:45, 7 April 2024 (UTC)

 Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. '''[[User:CanonNi]]''' (talk|contribs) 00:34, 8 April 2024 (UTC)