Talk:World War I prisoners of war in Germany

A fact from World War I prisoners of war in Germany appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 28 March 2008, and was viewed approximately 2,314 times (disclaimer) (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that Germany still held 1.2 million Russian prisoners of war in December 1918, nine months after the Treaty of Brest-Litovsk obliged it to release them?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2008/March.

Wikipedia

Biography: Military

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the military biography work group (assessed as Low-importance).

Military history: Biography / European / German / World War I

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military biography task force
	European military history task force
	German military history task force
	World War I task force

Reference section unwieldy[edit]

This article makes excellent use of appropriate sources, however, the given bibliography is a bit confusing. The list could probably be shortened a bit by consolidating notes (will have to give a more thorough read later), but some tinkering definitely needs to be done with the formatting. Op cit is used in places that it shouldn't be. Instead of using it every time a previously-cited work is cited again, it should only be used when the work is just above the last cited work; otherwise, use Ibid. Also, there is no point to using Op cit or Ibid while simultaneously giving the name of the author: it's redundant. Of course, I see why one would do that for a constantly edited piece such as a wikipedia article. That is why I think the latin abbreviations should be removed from this reference guide, particularly since this one is so large.

This also would mesh with the suggestion re: Wikipedia:Footnotes#Style_recommendations, which says "Do not use ibid., op. cit. or similar abbreviations in footnotes. Other editors who add new references to the article may not take the time to correct Ibid references broken by their addition. Furthermore, not all readers are familiar with the meaning of the terms. If a reference is reused in more than one footnote, it is preferable to use the format "Smith, Short Title, 182" rather than "Ibid, 182", so as to avoid these problems, or use named references if appropriate."

Unclebanglin (talk) 06:30, 2 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Possible source[edit]

This might just be interesting for this article, the subject being exactly prisoners of war in Germany during WWI... 198.84.253.202 (talk) 03:35, 7 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]