Talk:World Environment Day

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the World Environment Day article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the On this day section on 12 dates. [show]

June 5, 2005, June 5, 2006, June 5, 2007, June 5, 2008, June 5, 2009, June 5, 2010, June 5, 2011, June 5, 2012, June 5, 2014, June 5, 2015, June 5, 2016, and June 5, 2023

Environment High‑importance

	Environment portal This environment-related article is part of the WikiProject Environment to improve Wikipedia's coverage of the environment. The aim is to write neutral and well-referenced articles on environment-related topics, as well as to ensure that environment articles are properly categorized. Read Wikipedia:Contributing FAQ and leave any messages at the project talk page.EnvironmentWikipedia:WikiProject EnvironmentTemplate:WikiProject EnvironmentEnvironment articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

International relations: United Nations Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject International relations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of International relations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.International relationsWikipedia:WikiProject International relationsTemplate:WikiProject International relationsInternational relations articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject United Nations.

Holidays

	Holidays portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Holidays, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of holidays on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HolidaysWikipedia:WikiProject HolidaysTemplate:WikiProject HolidaysHolidays articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Fair use rationale for Image:WEDlogo2006.jpg[edit]

Image:WEDlogo2006.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 16:37, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Added rationale and deleted template. Let me know if I left out anything necessary.--Hjal 17:29, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Theme 2020 or Theme 2011?[edit]

I believe that the section -Theme 2020 - is supposed to be Theme 2011. I am not absolutely sure, since I'm not an expert in this field, but here is a reference source: http://www.unep.org/wed/WEDThatWas/2011/

Pianone (talk) 14:44, 19 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi friend Jitu444 (talk) 03:07, 4 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

It seems that the 2020 mistake was corrected. The link for 2011 you gave no longer works but I found a partial one for 2011. More would be better, here or in article. Thanks Pianone. Swliv (talk) 16:59, 17 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problem removed[edit]

Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: official site. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 18:07, 24 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on World Environment Day. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20070601181022/http://www.wed.npolar.no:80/world-environment-day-2007/view?set_language=en to http://www.wed.npolar.no/world-environment-day-2007/view?set_language=en

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 05:12, 11 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Remove the 'PR' template?[edit]

Some of my complaint is with the wording of the template, particularly "or a news article" and 'sensationalism' for different reasons. One can see some discussion of this sort of complaint at Template_talk:Cleanup-PR#Should_there_be_guidelines_for_when_editor_disagrees_with_a_tagging? and elsewhere on that Talk page. But as it appears on the WED page here, the template doesn't add enough constructive that I see and the 'sensationalism' allusion in particular seems gratuitous and inapplicable. I favor removing the PR template.

If the template is removed I would suggest replacing it with something like:

This article may require cleanup to meet Wikipedia's quality standards. The specific problem is: Dead links, identified and maybe not yet IDd (unep.org is now unenvironment.org; unep.org/wed is now, more or less, worldenvironmentday.global, for example). More non-UN citation-sources would also be good. Please help improve this article if you can.

Please signal agreement or disagreement or other thoughts on one or both changes below. Thanks. Swliv (talk) 18:48, 17 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

World environmental day[edit]

Th 2409:4042:2E82:39AD:0:0:1DC9:A60F (talk) 13:51, 4 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Natural environment day[edit]

Environment day is celebrated annually on June 5 and is the United Nations' principal vehicle for encouraging awareness and action for the protection of the environment. These acts help to protect nature and the planet earth. People are supposed to do good things for the natural environment and sustainability. It is run by the United Nations Environment programme

       Happy world environment day 103.70.197.245 (talk) 15:19, 4 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

In[edit]

Ok 2409:4073:211B:DEB2:0:0:26AB:50A1 (talk) 15:07, 22 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

World environment day[edit]

World environment day 223.230.43.158 (talk) 23:45, 1 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Naruto[edit]

Anime character 2405:201:C029:B022:E02D:C323:BA3F:3087 (talk) 01:31, 11 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

he is the strongest person that can beat every superhero and anime characters 2402:4000:1181:D9E8:114E:5221:7087:19B1 (talk) 12:23, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

that is correct my man 2402:4000:1181:D9E8:114E:5221:7087:19B1 (talk) 12:23, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

yap 2402:4000:1181:D9E8:114E:5221:7087:19B1 (talk) 12:24, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

2402:4000:1181:D9E8:114E:5221:7087:19B1 (talk) 12:24, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

g 2402:4000:1181:D9E8:114E:5221:7087:19B1 (talk) 12:25, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

why should we plant saplings each year?[edit]

than killing trees we must actually plant saplings so we help mother nature grow trees as trees are the lungs of the earth as the trees help us reduce carbon dioxide and give us oxygen to breath we must grow trees every year 2402:4000:1181:D9E8:114E:5221:7087:19B1 (talk) 12:21, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Is It 1973 or 1974 or 1972[edit]

I have checked multiple sites on which year was it first. It told it was during 1972 Stockholm Conference. But in other sites it says 1974,but here it says 1973. Who should I believe???? So here it is stated 1973 I think it shpuld be changed. Farzad Thangal (talk) 14:56, 19 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]