Talk:Women LEAD

This article was nominated for deletion on 5 August 2013 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep.

This article was nominated for deletion on 2 December 2012 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep.

	Feminism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Feminism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Feminism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FeminismWikipedia:WikiProject FeminismTemplate:WikiProject FeminismFeminism articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Nepal

	Nepal portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Nepal, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Nepal-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page and add your name to the member's list.NepalWikipedia:WikiProject NepalTemplate:WikiProject NepalNepal articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Contested deletion[edit]

This page should not be speedily deleted, because the article "credibly asserts its importance" with references from Forbes, Huff Post, etc. I can't see any promotional tone in the article either, though I'm open to advice on this. This article was tagged for speedy deletion only a minute after its creation. Can't you give me a chance to address what you think is wrong with the article? Thanks, -- Ruby Murray (talk) 19:40, 2 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The issue with your rationale is that this isn't a actual forbes article, rather a blog from a fan of the magazine. Hell In A Bucket (talk) 19:43, 2 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

And the rest of the references? All worthless? Ruby Murray (talk) 19:45, 2 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This article should not have been marked for speedily deletion. New page reviewers are advised to review WP:BITE and the CSD criteria. Gobōnobō ⁺ ^c 19:48, 2 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I'll keep that in mind if I come close to biting them. Nominating a page for deletion is hardly biting.Hell In A Bucket (talk) 19:52, 2 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion as spam, a minute after it was created? Is that your idea of friendly advice? Where's the spam? Ruby Murray (talk) 20:00, 2 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not here to be your friend, sorry, I based my opinon off of the notability policies, the articles such as Forbes were by contributers and not actual employees as was Huff post, a self authored page by one of the founders. Also the list doesn't count as organizational inclusions of lists "inclusion in lists of similar organizations" It simply doesn't pass notability. Hell In A Bucket (talk) 20:07, 2 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I'll try to improve the sources to address notability. But you still haven't answered: where's the spam? Ruby Murray (talk) 20:13, 2 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]