Talk:Wizard of Oz experiment
 | This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Help this article![edit]
I am neither a psychologist or a sociologist, but someone should fix this article, and focus it onto the subject instead of going off onto tangents. Angryapathy (talk) 16:10, 25 March 2010 (UTC)
As someone with expertise in the field, I found this article very useful. I don't see the interesting history here as a tangent. I was pleased to see who'd authored much of it. Just what wikepedia needs. Gilbert Cockton —Preceding unsigned comment added by 195.97.217.238 (talk) 17:10, 26 March 2010 (UTC)
Popular Culture[edit]
Off the top of my head, the once-popular Indie game Sleep is Death would be a fine entry in an "In Popular Culture" section that I believe this article should have. And I am sure there are plenty of other things as well, no doubt. --NeatNit (talk) 21:40, 14 March 2013 (UTC)
So what is the opposite?[edit]
What would the opposite be? What would be called when a person believes they are communicating with a person, but that person is actually communicating with an autonomous computer system? The only thing I can think of would be called Failing the Turing Test. What would be a more applicable name? Nutster (talk) 22:42, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
"a testing or iterative design methodology"[edit]
This phrase, "a testing or iterative design methodology" is ambiguous, maybe wrong. For one, testing and iterative are not opposites. I dont understand the intent well enough to correct the phrase. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Marius63 (talk • contribs) 13:00, 12 January 2022 (UTC)