Talk:William de Ros, 6th Baron Ros

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Featured articleWilliam de Ros, 6th Baron Ros is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so.
On this day... Article milestones
DateProcessResult
June 12, 2018Good article nomineeListed
December 7, 2018Peer reviewReviewed
January 10, 2019Featured article candidatePromoted
On this day... Facts from this article were featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on November 1, 2019, and November 1, 2022.
Current status: Featured article

GA Review[edit]

GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:William de Ros, 6th Baron de Ros/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Auntieruth55 (talk · contribs) 15:22, 5 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I'll start this review in a few days. auntieruth (talk) 15:22, 5 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Read it through, suggest a couple of edits here ...included some incomplete sentences, and a few other hiccups. Also, lands were centered in, not focused on.... I think..... If this is good, I'll be ready to pass. I think you can remove the complicating bit of the opening paragraph on inheriting because his brother died. Minor detail that you cover sufficiently in article. auntieruth (talk) 14:36, 11 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Thanks for that Auntieruth55. I agree with the edits you made there—the non-breaking spaces are always tricky for me—and I've removed the bit about his bro from the lead (William inherited his father's barony, with extensive lands centred on Lincolnshire, in 1394 now), and got rid of focused, well spotted; It's probably my blind spot, but I can't see any more clipped sentences—do any jump out at you? Thanks again! —SerialNumber54129 paranoia /cheap sh*t room 15:44, 11 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • nothing else jumped out at me on the second and third reads, so we're good. nice job covering a complicated period! Cheers, auntieruth (talk) 13:45, 12 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Very kind Auntieruth55, thanks very much! —SerialNumber54129 paranoia /cheap sh*t room 14:04, 12 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:

Modern productions[edit]

In 1964, as part of the Royal Shakespeare Company's staging of the Henriad, co-directed by Peter Hall, John Barton and Clifford Williams,[1] and with David Warner as the King...part of Ross cut due to them condensing the plays? ——SerialNumber54129 18:00, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

References

  1. ^ Chambers 2004, p. 313.
  • Chambers, C. (2004). Inside the Royal Shakespeare Company: Creativity and the Institution. London: Routledge. ISBN 978-1-13461-631-2. {{cite book}}: Invalid |ref=harv (help)
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:William_de_Ros,_6th_Baron_Ros&oldid=1205106999"