This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is part of WikiProject Alabama, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Alabama on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit this article, or visit the project page to join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.AlabamaWikipedia:WikiProject AlabamaTemplate:WikiProject AlabamaAlabama articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Florida. If you would like to join us, please visit the project page; if you have any questions, please consult the FAQ.FloridaWikipedia:WikiProject FloridaTemplate:WikiProject FloridaFlorida articles
I changed a mere to only because a mere makes it sound like he died young. Is there any reason this was done? See hereJakesyl (talk) 16:28, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Relocated from the article text: "This article's was originally inserted to recognize an individual who had lived for over a century, and had observed this country through many of its most trying times, This introductory paragraph has been modified from its original content to add the thoughts of an individual who holds more faith in census reports from a sparsly populated SOUTH, in the early 1800's (No television, No internet, No radio, Not much of an organized mail delivery), in a time where most people in the south had little or no faith in the Northern government. However, most of the people who know of this man and the life he lived and people whose life he affected know his claim to be true. Neither his claim or any of the other three claimants (two from the Confederate Army, and one from the army of northern aggression) has been dicredited by any credible source." (relocated by Dravecky (talk) 20:27, 11 April 2008 (UTC))[reply]
I feel some mention of the fact that Census records from this era are highly unreliable. I could show a 1900 census record of my great grandfather showing he was 9yo when his first child was born then another census that (correctly) shows he was 19yo, which is approximated from his date of birth. These records were hand written on paper ledgers using fountain pens that were dipped in inkwells and often smeared badly or difficult to read even when the ledge was new, and so much more so about 100 years later when transferred to microfilm, then 50 some years later converted to digital records and often poorly done. It is often very difficult to tell what dates wee carelessly scribbled into the columns and there were several steps in which human error could have occurred. In my opinion the fact that his military pension was granted by the US government for service in the Confederate Army should put any doubt to rest. If one wants to claim someone is a fraud, then you need more proof than a highly unreliable date on a census which even if it is legible on the microfilm doesn't prove the census worker correctly entered it. Donb316 (talk) 19:04, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
