This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Food and drink, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of food and drink related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Food and drinkWikipedia:WikiProject Food and drinkTemplate:WikiProject Food and drinkFood and drink articles
Delete unrelated trivia sections found in articles. Please review WP:Trivia and WP:Handling trivia to learn how to do this.
Add the {{WikiProject Food and drink}} project banner to food and drink related articles and content to help bring them to the attention of members. For a complete list of banners for WikiProject Food and drink and its child projects, select here.
Contributors appear to be directly related to Wildtype ~ Eejit43 (talk) 02:26, 1 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Eejit43: Well-spotted, apparently someone from the company sought to add some extra stuff in the article that isn't mentioned in any of the sources I used. The renaming is probably correct, the media seem to get the name wrong all the time. The funding bit might be true, but it is unsourced; I'll leave that an open challenge. Some of the rewriting is fine. But I cut out all the promotional unsourced failed verification stuff that has been added. I think the text has been cleaned up, how about you? Cheers, Nederlandse Leeuw (talk) 20:25, 2 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
That looks a lot better; thanks so much! I'll remove the COI tag. ~ Eejit43 (talk) 20:30, 2 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
You're welcome! Best wishes for 2023 to you as well. Nederlandse Leeuw (talk) 20:58, 2 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
.svg){kind=small}
~ Eejit43 (talk) 20:30, 2 January 2023 (UTC)
