Talk:Wench Trouble

A fact from Wench Trouble appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 25 April 2009 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that to create an authentic fantasy setting in the Kröd Mändoon pilot episode "Wench Trouble", costumes were built without zippers or velcro and weapons were built by an ancient weapon replica specialist?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2009/April.

Wikipedia

Television: Episode coverage Low‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Episode coverage task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Comedy Low‑importance

	Comedy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comedy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of comedy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComedyWikipedia:WikiProject ComedyTemplate:WikiProject ComedyComedy articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

2nd paragraph: "authentic costumes"[edit]

Since this is a fantasy series, how can the costumes be authentic? Maybe rephrase it to say something like "...had the costumes and weapons specifically built to maintain..." -92.228.89.189 (talk) 20:05, 30 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Well, the source reads this way, but I hear where you're coming from. I've tried to tweak it a bout, and could do so more if need be. — Hunter Kahn _(contribs) 00:32, 31 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]