Talk:Wandsworth Bridge

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Featured articleWandsworth Bridge is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so.
Main Page trophyThis article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on January 16, 2016.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
May 7, 2009Good article nomineeListed
August 25, 2010Featured article candidatePromoted
Did You Know
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on May 8, 2009.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that Wandsworth Bridge has been described as "probably the least noteworthy bridge in London"?
Current status: Featured article

least noteworthy?[edit]

This bridge seems pretty noteworthy considering that of all the bridges in London, it's the least noteworthy. 216.165.132.250 (talk) 17:11, 8 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

While it's a claim that's been quite widely repeated – and hence included in the article – it's not one I agree with in the least. Even among the big Thames bridges, there are many more that I'd consider less noteworthy both architecturally and in terms of their impact on the areas they serve (Battersea Railway Bridge? Teddington Lock Footbridge?) – and if we're going with "in London" as opposed to "over the Thames", there are literally dozens if not hundreds of bridges that will never even be notable enough to warrant an article of their own – are you seriously suggesting that one of the busiest bridges in the world is less notable than the Northumberland Park railway station footbridge? – iridescent 17:27, 8 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This claim is surely a victim of the Interesting number paradox?

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Wandsworth Bridge. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:58, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]