Talk:Wabbit Twouble

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the American cinema task force.

Animation: American / Looney Tunes Mid‑importance

	Animation portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Animation, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to animation on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, help out with the open tasks, or contribute to the discussion.AnimationWikipedia:WikiProject AnimationTemplate:WikiProject AnimationAnimation articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the American animation work group (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by the Looney Tunes work group (assessed as Mid-importance).

Internet culture Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Internet culture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of internet culture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Internet cultureWikipedia:WikiProject Internet cultureTemplate:WikiProject Internet cultureInternet culture articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article is supported by the YouTube Task Force.

WikiProject Internet culture To-do:

edit
history
watch
purge

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : View all requested internet culture articles
Expand : Pick an article from here or here
Photo : Category:Internet culture articles needing images
Stubs : All stubs are located here
Other : Category:Internet self-classification codes (!?); Try to get YouTube to FA; Tag all articles you find with {{WikiProject Internet culture}}
- See also Category:Internet culture articles needing attention

I've seen this cartoon before! =D[edit]

I've seen this BB cartoon, along with many others, hundreds of times! It's one of my favorites! Angie Y. 18:39, 8 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

They should mention the ironic use of Big Chungus in 2020[edit]

Basically, the ironic use of it satirizing redditors. I mean, they have a section on it for 2018, so why not? I consider it relevant enough, htere must be some quotation mentioning it somewhere... — Preceding unsigned comment added by Teuf0rt (talk • contribs) 19:41, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Tons of memes have had ironic or semi-ironic resurgences lately. I don't think pointing out the Big Chungus resurgence specifically would do the phenomenon justice. 73.157.115.95 (talk) 06:39, 12 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Wabbit Twouble2.jpg[edit]

Image:Wabbit Twouble2.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 05:34, 30 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Wabbit Twouble3.jpg[edit]

Image:Wabbit Twouble3.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 05:35, 30 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:WabbitTwouble.jpg[edit]

Image:WabbitTwouble.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 03:25, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please![edit]

Somebody get rid of all the useless W's scattered across the page? Thanks if you did. 71.86.193.25 (talk) —Preceding undated comment was added at 22:57, 11 January 2009 (UTC).[reply]

Actually, yes and no. I kept it in for the credited cast only, including a note with the corrected names in the article. The names of Robert Clampett, Carl Stalling, and Sid Sutherland (as well as the roles Supervision, Musical Direction, and Story) are misspelled in the credits and must be shown as such. --AEMoreira042281 (talk) 20:09, 9 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Except that Arthur Q. "Bwyan" is uncredited, so posting it that way is "original research". Also, for consistency, the uncredited voice should be given as "Mehw Bwanc". :) I put the "h" in there since otherwise it looks like what a kitten says. :) Baseball Bugs ^{What's up, Doc?} carrots 20:29, 9 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  - Just fixed that. I changed it. --AEMoreira042281 (talk) 03:12, 10 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The "w"s are pure cringe. Is this Wikipedia or not? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 159.2.47.240 (talk) 00:25, 6 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Perhaps some people forget that this is supposed to be a serious encyclopedia and not proto-Uncyclopedia 73.157.115.95 (talk) 06:36, 12 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

BUGS BUNNY IN[edit]

this pre title page does not appear to be drawn; it looks like a photograph. is that worthy of mention or not? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.74.177.176 (talk) 02:33, 21 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]