Talk:WSCV

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleWSCV has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Good topic starWSCV is part of the ON TV (TV network) series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
October 12, 2022Good article nomineeListed
October 31, 2022Good topic candidatePromoted
Did You Know
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on October 28, 2022.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that a Florida TV station operated from an abandoned amusement park?
Current status: Good article

July 2022[edit]

@Sammi Brie: Speaking of Pirates World, do you think you can improve that article with more on the rock concerts, drug dealings, etc.? Mvcg66b3r (talk) 15:54, 15 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


This review is transcluded from Talk:WSCV/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Lee Vilenski (talk · contribs) 20:55, 9 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Hello, I am planning on reviewing this article for GA Status, over the next couple of days. Thank you for nominating the article for GA status. I hope I will learn some new information, and that my feedback is helpful.

If nominators or editors could refrain from updating the particular section that I am updating until it is complete, I would appreciate it to remove a edit conflict. Please address concerns in the section that has been completed above (If I've raised concerns up to references, feel free to comment on things like the lede.)

I generally provide an overview of things I read through the article on a first glance. Then do a thorough sweep of the article after the feedback is addressed. After this, I will present the pass/failure. I may use strikethrough tags when concerns are met. Even if something is obvious why my concern is met, please leave a message as courtesy.

Best of luck! you can also use the {{done}} tag to state when something is addressed. Lee Vilenski (talkcontribs)

Please let me know after the review is done, if you were happy with the review! Obviously this is regarding the article's quality, however, I want to be happy and civil to all, so let me know if I have done a good job, regardless of the article's outcome.

Links[edit]

Prose[edit]

Lede[edit]

  • As WSMS-TV and WKID, it was an English-language independent station in two stints. - needs a reword. Currently not a sentence. Lee Vilenski (talkcontribs) 20:42, 10 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • After a number of years as a carrier for the ON TV subscription service, the owner of ON TV, Oak Communications, sold WKID-TV in 1984 to John Blair & Co., which relaunched it the next year as Spanish-language WSCV - needs a reword to avoid redundancy. Lee Vilenski (talkcontribs) 20:42, 10 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • since grown in size and stature in the market and in the area of local news. - bit promo-y in my eyes. Do we have any metrics we can point too? Lee Vilenski (talkcontribs) 20:42, 10 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

General[edit]

  • You missed the link a couple sentences early. Side note: WSCV I had improved parts of previously...so if you see mistakes I don't typically make, that's probably why.
  • Though one objection was made to Channel 51, Inc.'s plans, by Hank Zinkil—a state representative and former mayor of Hollywood attempting to exaggerate that Pirates World had been "the source of great controversy" due to rock concerts which required consistent crowd control, and a drug dealing site—[12] the FCC shrugged off Zinkil's challenge, and from a new 1,049-foot (320 m) tower affording market-wide coverage,[13] WKID returned to the air on February 14, 1972.[14] - this is all one sentence, split. Lee Vilenski (talkcontribs) 21:07, 10 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • You linked the FCC earlier but didn't state it's initials. Lee Vilenski (talkcontribs) 21:07, 10 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • 1975 was a year of unique - never start a sentence with a number.Lee Vilenski (talkcontribs) 21:07, 10 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Shortly after two bombs went off at those studios in Dania, and a production office the station leased in Miami on the night of February 24[15][16]—an attack for which a Cuban exile group took credit, blaming WKID's policy of rapprochement with communist Cuba in its Spanish-language programming[17]—Channel 51, Inc. went bankrupt in March,[9] and Pirates World with the WKID studio was condemned in September.[18] - long sentences seem quite often. Should probably split to talk about the bombs then why there were bombs and then aftermath. Lee Vilenski (talkcontribs) 21:07, 10 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Why is there a further information tag half way through a section? Lee Vilenski (talkcontribs) 21:07, 10 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • The ON TV article covers the 1980–84 period; the section header covers the 1972–84 period. I moved it up, though. Sammi Brie (she/her • tc) 05:25, 11 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • A few times you put asides in the article. Things like —later 6 p.m. should be notes instead. Lee Vilenski (talkcontribs) 21:07, 10 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • I've tried to cut back or reword some of these long sentences. Pinging Lee Vilenski; I should have covered everything up to this point. Sammi Brie (she/her • tc) 05:25, 11 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Review meta comments[edit]

Ok, cool. I can't see any copyvio or any issues with the links, so I'll promote now. Lee Vilenski (talkcontribs) 20:09, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Did you know nomination[edit]

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by RoySmith (talk) 14:15, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Improved to Good Article status by Sammi Brie (talk). Self-nominated at 20:45, 12 October 2022 (UTC).[reply]

General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
QPQ: Done.
Overall: @Sammi Brie: Great Article!. Hooks are interesting, article is sourced, and the QPQ is done. I Approve the nomination. Onegreatjoke (talk) 22:39, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]