Talk:Visteon

Automobiles Mid‑importance

	Cars portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Automobiles, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of automobiles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AutomobilesWikipedia:WikiProject AutomobilesTemplate:WikiProject AutomobilesAutomobile articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Business Mid‑importance

	Business portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

expand?

Confused[edit]

I can't work out from the description of Automotive Components Holdings when it is talking about plants still in Visteon and when about those ACH - can the author rewrite this more clearly? From the Web, there still appear to be several Visteon (formerly Ford UK) plants and other facilities in Britain. Pterre (talk) 15:06, 22 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It does not make any sense to me either. I have just been phoned by a job agency about a post at Visteon in Chelmsford, UK. Yet reading this article, one would think Visteon have no pressence here. I wonder if it would be better removed until it is more accurate? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.147.226.131 (talk) 09:42, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright Reversion[edit]

Does anyone know why this article was tagged for copyright and then subsequently cleaned? The article used to have a structure previous to this but now it lacks a great deal of detail and overarching presentation. Can we revert back to a previous version and remove copyright concerns only? Kurjagger (talk) 16:55, 15 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]