Talk:Vincent Lee Chuan Leong
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Vincent Lee Chuan Leong article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Requested move 22 March 2024[edit]
It has been proposed in this section that Vincent Lee Chuan Leong be renamed and moved to 1999 Singapore kidnapping case. A bot will list this discussion on requested moves' current discussions subpage within an hour of this tag being placed. The discussion may be closed 7 days after being opened, if consensus has been reached (see the closing instructions). Please base arguments on article title policy, and keep discussion succinct and civil. Please use {{subst:requested move}} . Do not use {{requested move/dated}} directly. |
Vincent Lee Chuan Leong → 1999 Singapore kidnapping case – The current title is effectively WP:BLP1E and WP:BLPCRIME. "Kidnapping of X" may not work given that the victim's name is generally not available outside, and even if so, we should generally avoid naming the victim here was 14yo when it happened. The proposed title is a descriptive one, and if there is a better alternative title, I am amenable to the proposed title as well. – robertsky (talk) 14:31, 22 March 2024 (UTC) — Relisting. asilvering (talk) 22:48, 29 March 2024 (UTC) — Relisting. BilledMammal (talk) 04:23, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support per nom. Tollens (talk) 07:26, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
- Comment. Was this the only kidnapping in Singapore in 1999? If not, then it's a poor title. -- Necrothesp (talk) 14:30, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
- It very likely was, and if not it's certainly the only remotely high-profile case that year. Kidnappings are very rare in Singapore, and it has quite a small population. Tollens (talk) 20:41, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
- Good question. I just did a search on Newslink (local news database accessible via local library membership), there was another 'kidnap' case in May 1999, but it turned out to be an extortion after the kid wanted to skip school:
Chin Theam Lai, 20, agreed to help his 15-year-old friend, David (not his real name), fake his own kidnap. (The boy cannot be named because of his age.) Why? So they could extort money from David's father. ... The plot began on May 3 when David decided to skip school and asked Chin [sic]
- - Kidnap, they wrote : Plot hatched on the back of fast-food tray liner, The Newpaper, 08/10/1999 (extract is 10% of the actual text, 52/537)
- It was resolved pretty fast, with Chin arrested on the following day after the police tracked down the calls Chin made over the two days. Chin was charged with extortion and pleaded guilty. – robertsky (talk) 00:43, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
- I am not sure how I didn't notice this before, but the article states:
The kidnapping was the first reported kidnapping case to occur in Singapore in a decade. The last case of kidnapping happened in April 1989, when 56-year-old goldsmith Phang Tee Wah was kidnapped by two men – 50-year-old Ibrahim Masod and 44-year-old Liow Han Heng – and later killed, and the men also attempted to extort ransom despite the death of Phang.
- It appears well sourced. Obviously this doesn't exclude any potential kidnappings after September, which is when that article was published, however. Tollens (talk) 04:52, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
- There isn't any kidnapping sep to dec 1999 in Singapore. – robertsky (talk) 16:27, 30 March 2024 (UTC)
- Note: WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography and WikiProject Singapore have been notified of this discussion. asilvering (talk) 22:48, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
- Support move to 1999 Singapore kidnapping, dropping "case" to be more WP:CONCISE; also looks like the standard title format from going through Category:Kidnapping by country. I trust the above research that no other kidnappings took place in the remainder of 1999 - FWIW I'm surprised the article doesn't mention the actual date of the kidnapping at all, and had to dig through the sources to find that it was 9 September. I'm also concerned that much of the descriptions of the legal proceedings is cited only to court documents, though that's out of scope here. ~ KN2731 {talk · contribs} 16:12, 30 March 2024 (UTC)
- NB: just noticed that information appears to have been oversighted. I put in a couple sentences with the dates of when the victim was kidnapped and released; hopefully that is not too much detail. ~ KN2731 {talk · contribs} 16:14, 30 March 2024 (UTC)
- I am fine with the shorter title. – robertsky (talk) 16:26, 30 March 2024 (UTC)
- Don't support move. This article is quite weird. It's about a kidnapping but very little detail on the actual kidnapping. Given the victim's age she shouldn't be named but to have no detail is odd if it's to be an event article. I think it would probably be better off staying as an article on the guy who did it in that case - if we can't have any information on the actual event due to privacy concerns. An event/crime article requires a section on the crime itself, not just the background of it, and since this was entirely removed and oversighted, no. This would be more confusing event-based. PARAKANYAA (talk) 03:49, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
Don't support move, because as the creator of the article in question, it is about the kidnapper Mr Lee, who is paroled and released since 2020, and the content leans more to him, the mastermind of the kidnapping and his personal life prior and after his incarceration. Plus there is no doubts raised over the notability of the crime back in 1999 and its aftermath and context. The proposed title is not really ideal for me, and I would, alternatively if the result is move, rename it as Vincent Lee Chuan Leong case or Vincent Lee case or its official court title Public Prosecutor v Vincent Lee Chuan Leong. Still, I affirm my stance that it should not be moved in general. --NelsonLee20042020 (talk) 07:20, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
- The current title makes the article a violation of BLP1E. The parole and release is just a consequence of the ruling. I am amenable to using the case name as the title as well provided that the legal significance of the case as a case law has been clearly stated, ie it being used as a precedence in subsequent case. – robertsky (talk) 08:03, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
- Considering detail on the event is privacy violating when it comes to the victim I think that would be good enough reason to keep it on the perpetrator in this case. PARAKANYAA (talk) 16:39, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
- Giving it a generic name such as '1999 Singapore kidnapping' or 'PP v Vincent Lee Chuan Leong' is better than pretending that this is a biography when it is about the kidnapping and the aftermath and yet still respecting the privacy of the victim. Of course there may be occasional reinclusion of the victim's details, but it will happen regardless of the article title. And this can be managed via other means such as setting the editing protection of the article if it has been done so in bad faith repeatedly. – robertsky (talk) 19:40, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
- Considering detail on the event is privacy violating when it comes to the victim I think that would be good enough reason to keep it on the perpetrator in this case. PARAKANYAA (talk) 16:39, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
Move to an alternative title of Vincent Lee kidnapping case. I agree that this article should be focused on the kidnapping case rather than the mastermind. However, I do not agree with the suggested title of '1999 Singapore kidnapping case'. In my opinion, even if there were indeed no other kidnappings in Singapore that year, the suggested title still feels vague and incomplete. --Blissfulclarity (talk) 14:18, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
- This will introduce a confusion in who was being kidnapped as the other (few) articles with this title format are of "[victim name] kidnapping case" format: Lindbergh kidnapping, and Geeta and Sanjay Chopra kidnapping case. There was also another Singapore kidnapping which article uses an association of the victim as the title, Sheng Siong kidnapping. – robertsky (talk) 15:00, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
- I still stand by my stance as stated in the earlier comments, but as a suggestion, 1999 Bukit Timah kidnapping can a bit more specific without being too generic. NelsonLee20042020 (talk) 02:43, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
- That's WP:OVERPRECISION, given we've established above there were no other kidnappings in Singapore in 1999. ~ KN2731 {talk · contribs} 13:18, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
- As mentioned previously, my opinion is that the title 1999 Singapore kidnapping still feels incomplete. While there is factually no ambiguity in the title as there is only one kidnapping in Singapore that year, the title still gives the impression of ambiguity. I would prefer Nelson's suggested title of 1999 Bukit Timah kidnapping. --Blissfulclarity (talk) 15:22, 14 April 2024 (UTC)
- That's WP:OVERPRECISION, given we've established above there were no other kidnappings in Singapore in 1999. ~ KN2731 {talk · contribs} 13:18, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
On some content being oversighted. Not relevant to the RM discussion. – robertsky (talk) 15:01, 3 April 2024 (UTC) |
---|
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it. |
|
- Biography articles of living people
- C-Class biography articles
- WikiProject Biography articles
- C-Class Crime-related articles
- Low-importance Crime-related articles
- WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography articles
- C-Class Singapore articles
- Low-importance Singapore articles
- WikiProject Singapore articles
- Requested moves