Talk:Vijay filmography

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Featured listVijay filmography is a featured list, which means it has been identified as one of the best lists produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
April 11, 2017Featured list candidatePromoted

Untitled[edit]

please do update about vijay 58

Semi-protected edit request on 28 December 2014[edit]

95.90.97.98 (talk) 19:27, 28 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I want to write the box office results of all movies.

 Not done Firstly, please be more specific and explicitly give the content you want changed: Which table, which cells, what information, based on which references? Secondly, I rather doubt such information is particularly helpful. For comparison, John Wayne filmography, Katherine Hepburn filmography and Shah Rukh Khan filmography do not provide box office results, and those results usually would not depend on a single actor anyway. Huon (talk) 19:33, 28 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 6 December 2017[edit]

need to update about new film Tsegaran95 (talk) 14:51, 6 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Not done: as you have not requested a specific change in the form "Please replace XXX with YYY" or "Please add ZZZ between PPP and QQQ".
More importantly, you have not cited reliable sources to back up your request, without which no information should be added to, or changed in, any article. - Arjayay (talk) 15:13, 6 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

this article needs to be properly updated with box office status that are totally in contrast with the actual film pages[edit]

eg films like ATM, kuruvi and villu are average films at box office only sura and puli was a flop. it needs to be updated and sentences like half did not do well at the box office??? how many?? and what are those??? totally misleading. This article needs to properly edited and updated with latest films we need some authorized good editors like Cyphoidbomb to work on this article. some editors revert even if i edit. thank you--Starunique (talk) 11:19, 19 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Starunique: I have now added box office information on the films you've mentioned.  — Ssven2 Looking at you, kid 12:44, 19 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

"His subsequent films that were released for the next year-and-a-half did not do well at the box office" totally misleading please do change it doesn't sound appropriate. or else mention the movie names??. thank you--Starunique (talk) 13:20, 19 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Starunique: Youth was the only one that performed decently. The others underperformed. The references support it. There's no necessity to state it.  — Ssven2 Looking at you, kid 14:08, 19 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Bagavathi was a hit , the next films vaseegara, puthiya geethai were flops after that comes thirumalai it is superhit how can you frame the sentence as a half did not do well at the box office its totally ridiculous bro. change it thank you--Starunique (talk) 14:15, 19 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Starunique: Done.  — Ssven2 Looking at you, kid 14:38, 19 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks bro. Its better if you mention those two films vaseegara and puthiya geethai as flops instead of that half did not do well at the box office.--Starunique (talk) 15:00, 19 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Starunique: I think you misunderstood my sentence. It reads "BARRING (meaning "except") Youth and Bagavathi, his subsequent films that were released for the next year-and-a-half underperformed at the box office." It means except Youth and Bagavathi, his films during that interval (from Tamizhan in 2002 to 2003, until Thirumalai) did not enjoy much success. Youth and Bagavathi fall under that interval (Youth was released in July 2002, while Bagavathi was a November release).  — Ssven2 Looking at you, kid 15:04, 19 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

puli is a fairy tale fantasy not a historical fantasy change the genre--Starunique (talk) 18:16, 19 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

correction[edit]

he did a cameo in bollywood in rowdy rathore it should be mentioned as he works mainly in tamil language films. priyamudan film he played a over-possessive villain mention it velayutham film he played a super hero like assassins creed mention it--Bothiman (talk) 07:09, 22 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

All these questions should have been raised at the list's FLC. --Kailash29792 (talk) 08:10, 22 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Vijay shahjahan film was a average grosser not a flop change it see source below[edit]

shahjahan film was a average grosser it is mentioned underperformed in box office change it see this sify source http://www.sify.com/movies/tirupachi-review-tamil-pclvGfehaddac.html Cyctolaugh (talk) 06:52, 10 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thalapathy 64[edit]

Plz update Shakkuakku (talk) 11:57, 28 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Has it begun shooting? Only then we will add. --Kailash29792 (talk) 12:45, 28 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 2 November 2019[edit]

Thirupaachi 69.122.18.176 (talk) 14:53, 2 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done. It's not clear what changes you want to make. –Deacon Vorbis (carbon • videos) 15:19, 2 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 7 November 2019[edit]

[1] 69.122.18.176 (talk) 01:00, 7 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done. It's not clear what changes you want to make. Please make a precise request. –Deacon Vorbis (carbon • videos) 01:18, 7 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

References

  1. ^ "Vasegara". {{cite web}}: Missing or empty |url= (help)

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 20:22, 6 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]