Talk:Victoria Sellers

This article was nominated for deletion on 5 July 2010 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep.

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Actors and Filmmakers

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by WikiProject Actors and Filmmakers.

Women

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women articles

This person is not notable[edit]

Although I'm not nominating this article for deletion at this time, I think that it probably should be deleted. The first three short paragraphs show little if any notability, and the final paragraph just describes her troubles with the law. I think that this violates our WP:BLP standards. Herostratus (talk) 06:24, 30 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. There is nothing in the article that is worth keeping, so I think the simple solution is to replace the article with a redirect to Peter Sellers. Or, ProD then AfD. Notability is not inherited: being the child of notable parents, or having a notable friend, is not sufficient. Having legal problems is also not notable. Johnuniq (talk) 11:42, 7 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Give the girl a break[edit]

OK, fine, this person is considered notable, per having survived an AfD. Let her take her place beside Einstein and Raphael in our pantheon of biographical articles. But this person is not very notable and we don't have to highlight every detail of her personal life, especially if it shows her in a bad light. What's the point? She's just a little fish. So let's concentrate on her acting achievements etc. and not go into arrests or whatever, OK? Herostratus (talk) 17:48, 14 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Lets not worry about what light we cast people in, as long as it is an ACCURATE light. And let's not worry about what people think of this, or that-- let's just deal in FACTS and accurate detail, whether the subject is notable or not, so that Wikipedia readers can be fully enlightened and informed and can make up their own minds! (204.112.66.148 (talk) 00:58, 19 April 2011 (UTC))[reply]

Notoriety is still fame[edit]

Daughter of two celebrities, and central figure in a major Hollywood scandal that attracted a lot of attention. Plenty of jailbirds get their own page, without being famous for anything else. Also it would be interesting to know what she's been doing more recently. 86.176.178.94 (talk) 17:54, 29 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

She is currently...[edit]

These claims should carry a date: ('As of xxxx'). Valetude (talk) 22:34, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]