Talk:Vaping

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

the "misbelief" that e-cigarettes are safer than traditional cigarettes[edit]

This is strange that based on one single study, this article say that "thinking that e-cig are safer is a misbelief". The e-cig topic is subject to controversy, so you have to cite systematic review when available.

https://www.nap.edu/resource/24952/012318ecigaretteConclusionsbyEvidence.pdf

Conclusion 5-3. There is substantial evidence that except for nicotine, under typical conditions of use, exposure to potentially toxic substances from e-cigarettes is significantly lower compared with combustible tobacco cigarettes

https://www.gov.uk/government/news/phe-publishes-independent-expert-e-cigarettes-evidence-review

vaping poses only a small fraction of the risks of smoking and switching completely from smoking to vaping conveys substantial health benefits

Namichel (talk) 14:54, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 28 November 2023[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) -- Maddy from Celeste (WAVEDASH) 16:05, 5 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Usage of electronic cigarettesVaping – Vaping is how people commonly use ecigs Chidgk1 (talk) 13:20, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Support per nom.--Ortizesp (talk) 13:48, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • This article is horribly written, largely unmaintained, and redundant to the content that's already in electronic cigarette. I suggest that we move this to draft pending a full rewrite for brevity and concision. Vaping already redirects to electronic cigarette so there's no loss there.—S Marshall T/C 15:12, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    The article is over 4 years old so definitely should not be sent to draft. If it's no good, we should either edit it, merge it to electronic cigarette, or send it to WP:AfD. - Station1 (talk) 01:41, 29 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    Definitely don't merge it to electronic cigarette, because that article already contains everything useful from this article. You're welcome to edit this content to fix it, but personally I won't be doing that because I've already spent enough hours of my life trying to fix QuackGuru's content. You're also welcome to AfD it.—S Marshall T/C 09:25, 29 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.