Talk:Ursulines/Archive 1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 1

I noticed...

I noticed that the well-known Order of the Ursulines did not have a wiki entry, and so I took it upon myself to start one. I intend on adding much more detail later, using the Catholic Encyclopedia and other sources.

This is my first article created, although I have made a number of edits and contributions in the past. --Sertrel 10:57, 2 Jan 2005 (UTC)

Wording Dispute

Thank you, Sertral, for taking it upon yourself to start a Wiki entry for the Ursulines. Having attended one of the U.S. colleges founded by the Ursulines, I am happy to see they have an entry, as their ideal of educating young women continues to live on even in modern times. Speaking of modern times, though, I think it best if you could edit the article to reword this sentence:
There were Ursulines in Canada in 1639, led by who taught the catechism to Indian children, and subsequently helped to preserve a religious spirit among the French population and to humanize the Indians and half-breeds.
While I understand this information has been garnered from the public domain 1911 Encyclopedia Britannica, it would scandalize today's Ursuline students (especially the largely diverse student population at The College of New Rochelle, which I attended) to have this entry refer to interracial Indian/French children as "half-breeds" and to have the missionary efforts of the Ursulines refered to as "humanizing." Those terms smack of a type of racial and cultural attitude that does not correlate with the Ursuline mission.
I also believe you should change the wording of "Indian" to "Native American." While doing so would make the entry more politically-correct, it is my opinion that it should also be done for academic purposes, so as to not confuse the native North American population with Indians from India.
Additionally, the sentence in question reads "...led by who taught..." and appears to omit a name. The 1911 Britannica entry does not supply a name, so I would delete "led by."

Ursulines of Quebec orphaned page

I just came across the previously orphaned page Ursulines of Quebec and thought I would try to find places to link to it. I added a link in the page Quebec City in the list of museums, as the museum at the monastery was already listed, without a link.

However, I next checked Talk:Ursulines of Quebec and found a note pointing out that the whole page had been copied fromt the Catholic Encyclopedia. This isn't kosher (to mix a metaphor) so that article should either be scrapped or redone from scratch.

The bits I added to that article are spelling out that it is in Quebec City at the top, and the address of the monastery/museum at the end.

Rats.Birdbrainscan 02:22, 15 October 2007 (UTC)

The Catholic Encyclopedia was published before 1923, and is therefore public domain. The article does not need to be deleted. Eugène van der Pijll 11:53, 15 October 2007 (UTC)

Bold text

re use of the word 'Alumni'

I have added the words 'of Ursuline schools' to clarify the amiguity to which someone recently drew attention. It would be a pity in my opinion to lose the information about Ursuline schools alumni altogether. In any case I personally doubt if any ambiguity existed in most readers minds; I doubt if many people imagine that Rula Lenska or Melinda Gates are nuns for example.Ranger2006 (talk) 12:46, 20 July 2009 (UTC) (Or even ex-nuns.)Ranger2006 (talk) 12:48, 20 July 2009 (UTC)

They could have been dropouts from the convent. All need to be moved to specific schools. Then they won't be "lost." Article is supposed to be about the order, not people, specifically, though the Mothers General can be listed I suppose. Student7 (talk) 22:05, 23 July 2009 (UTC)

Copyright problem removed

Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://www.angelamerici.it/news_schede_eng.php?testata=Orsoline%20America%20del%20Nord&get_id=135. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)

For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. Lucas559 (talk) 16:32, 18 August 2015 (UTC)

Citations needed

Added four citations to the page, hopefully that helps. There are still a few citations that need to be added as support. Arnold.kevin729 (talk) 18:19, 2 June 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Ursulines. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:44, 26 December 2017 (UTC)

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Ursulines/Archive_1&oldid=1061959282"