Talk:University College Birmingham

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Is it time . . . . .[edit]

To rename the BCFTCS entry (and upgrade it) now that they are proudly proclaiming the name change (to University College Birmingham) on their web site? Quartic (talk) 20:30, 7 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, I reckon ... JimmyGuano (talk) 23:51, 7 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move[edit]

This article has been renamed from Birmingham College of Food, Tourism and Creative Studies to University College Birmingham as the result of a move request.

The following is a closed discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the proposal was - Move.

According to the college's website [1] the college was renamed University College Birmingham with effect from 7 January 2008. JimmyGuano (talk) 23:51, 7 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the lesson in what to do! Regards. Quartic (talk) 01:12, 8 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'm going to request that the existing University College Birmingham article be deleted so we can move this article there. Cordless Larry (talk) 14:28, 8 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Neutrality tag[edit]

I have removed the neutrality tag placed by User:Computerjoe in October 2008. No discussion has been initiated on this and there appears to be no reason for it. Jezhotwells (talk) 22:28, 22 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Some sections were too detailed and struck me as an advertisement. Perhaps the NPOV tag was a bit too harsh, but some favourable words are unneeded. Computerjoe's talk 14:19, 23 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

changes on UCB page[edit]

i've not edited pages on wikipedia before and would like some advice on my doing so as an employee of UCB - there are a number of innacuracies and amendements needed on the page - i don't think they constitute advertising - an example would be that The University of Birmingham 'accredits' rather than awards our degrees - we have recently amended our website to reflect that difference. shall i go ahead and make the changes i feel are needed or post them in a new talk section so they can be changed by another member of the community? thank you in advance for your kind help. Marsha.collins (talk) 16:07, 9 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I cannot see a problem with you changing the page if the changes are minor in nature and not controversial. Though I would read Conflict of Interest first. Keith D (talk) 17:36, 9 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

HESA Statistics[edit]

The HESA statistics which inform the total students number is misleading in that it counts all enrolments rather than students, this is particularly significant for Further Education students who may be enrolled on multiple programmes on a single academic year - i.e. they nay be doing both an NVQ 1 and 2 in the same subject. HESA recognise this as two students and the total student number is artificially inflated - HESA acknowledge this themselves in note 15 below HESA notes to tables would be great to get some advice on how to tackle this edit Marsha.collins (talk) 14:27, 10 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

UCB Granted Full University Status[edit]

http://www.ucb.ac.uk/about-us/news-and-media/latest-news/2012/12/ucb-granted-full-university-status.aspx — Preceding unsigned comment added by 194.83.36.202 (talk) 13:20, 13 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on University College Birmingham. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:01, 5 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]