This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Marketing & Advertising, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Marketing on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Marketing & AdvertisingWikipedia:WikiProject Marketing & AdvertisingTemplate:WikiProject Marketing & AdvertisingMarketing & Advertising articles
This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Telecommunications, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Telecommunications on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TelecommunicationsWikipedia:WikiProject TelecommunicationsTemplate:WikiProject TelecommunicationsTelecommunications articles
Pratyeka, can you help establish that this meets WP:NOTABILITY? It's been tagged for notability for 9 years now. Thanks for any help you can offer, Boleyn (talk) 20:35, 28 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
It's certainly a widely used industry term, which a quick Google search will validate. So I'm strongly against any suggestion that it should be removed. Finding someone who loves marketing world technology terms enough to improve the article is not going to be easy, but it definitely deserves to live. prat (talk) 20:08, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Pratyeka: I have now removed the notability tag from the article. But sources to be put in the article still need to be found. GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 17:20, 18 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Actually, I have now re-added the tag. The source I added was only a blog source. I will send the article to AfD next. GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 23:16, 11 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]