Talk:United States ex rel. Gerald Mayo v. Satan and His Staff

	Religion portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Religion, a project to improve Wikipedia's articles on Religion-related subjects. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the wikiproject page for more details.ReligionWikipedia:WikiProject ReligionTemplate:WikiProject ReligionReligion articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is within the scope of Interfaith work group, a work group which is currently considered to be inactive.

United States Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Law Low‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment[edit]

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 23 August 2018 and 13 December 2018. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): DougGirard19.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 12:02, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Untitled[edit]

The final sentence of this wiki page seems silly to me: "The case has been cited several times, and has never been overturned or contradicted." The case rested on one very simple legal issue, the Plaintiff failed to include with his complaint the required form of instructions for the United States Marshal for directions as to service of process. Thus, it seems inappropriate to end the article on the note that the case has not been overturned or contradicted-- this would indicate that the case was somehow controversial or that the legal principle was in dispute. But it's not a controversial case and the legal issue is not in dispute. Estrbrook (talk) 03:07, 26 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It is interesting, however, that the case has been cited by other courts (usually tongue-in-cheek). bd2412 T 03:19, 26 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, it is a funny case. I would be good to add back in the "it's been cited several times" part. Estrbrook (talk) 09:11, 26 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]