Talk:Typhoon Etau (2003)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleTyphoon Etau (2003) has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Good topic starTyphoon Etau (2003) is part of the 2003 Pacific typhoon season series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
December 4, 2013Good article nomineeListed
October 27, 2014Good topic candidatePromoted
Current status: Good article

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:Typhoon Etau (2003)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Juliancolton (talk · contribs) 03:04, 4 December 2013 (UTC) I'll be reviewing this article. Should be done very shortly. – Juliancolton | Talk 03:04, 4 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Looks great overall. I have a few minor suggestions before I pass the article.

  • The origins of Typhoon Etau were from an area of convection that formed near Chuuk State on July 31, with a weak circulation to the east. - you link Atmospheric circulation, but that term refers to large-scale circulation (like the Hadley Cell, for example). Different wording or linking is needed. Also, it's a bit difficult to parse that the circulation was some undefined distance "east" of the convection, so I think you'd do well to better explain either the relationship of the two aspects of the disturbance, or see if you can find out why it was disjointed (just shearing?).
  • with convection organized into outflow to the south - this is also confusing. Convection produces outflow, but doesn't become it.
  • Increasing wind shear and cooler air caused Etau to weaken, although it still maintained 10 minute winds of 140 km/h (85 mph) when it made landfall near Muroto on the Japanese island of Shikoku, shortly before 1300 UTC on August 8. - couple things here. Cooler air doesn't by itself cause a storm to weaken - if you can confirm that the air was "drier" or "more stable", or that the SSTs were actually what was cooler, that would be beneficial I think. Also, the sentence as a whole is rather verbose; my brain felt a little out-of-breath after reading it.
    • The ATCR said "it began to slowly weaken as it encountered increasing vertical wind shear, cool air and the mountainous terrain of Shikoku and Honshu". GP just attributes the weakening to the shear, so I went with JTWC here since it provided more. And I split the sentence in two, easy enough. --♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 04:08, 4 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • I know the reason for this, but the text talks about the storm making landfall on Hokkaido, while the adjacent track map clearly doesn't show that. I'm afraid it might be confusing to n00bs if they don't know the source of the discrepancy. A small in-text agency attribution would work.
  • In the Amami Islands, about 45,000 houses, or 53% of residents, lost power due to high winds from the storm. - there might not be anything wrong here, but a house is different from a resident in terms of power outages. Are you sure the two are used in the right place?
    • Good point. I moved the "53%" portion to the end of the sentence. --♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 04:08, 4 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Throughout Japan, Etau disrupted flight and train travel,[4] causing over 1,000 flights to be canceled,[30] and for bullet trains to operate at a slower speed, causing delays. - this line kind of says the same things twice each. Any way to condense it?
    • Yea, I cut the first part. That was in the sandbox phase and became redundant. --♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 04:08, 4 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

That's about it. I would also suggest using Digital Typhoon as the publisher instead of the author for the references to that site, but it's not a big issue. – Juliancolton | Talk 03:48, 4 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks a lot for the review! I switched the DT links, fwiw. --♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 04:08, 4 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Cool! Everything looks great now. – Juliancolton | Talk 14:28, 4 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Typhoon Etau (2003). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:29, 22 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]