Talk:Two-dimensional nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy

Physics Low‑importance

	Physics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysicsWikipedia:WikiProject PhysicsTemplate:WikiProject Physicsphysics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Spectroscopy (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Spectroscopy, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.SpectroscopyWikipedia:WikiProject SpectroscopyTemplate:WikiProject SpectroscopySpectroscopy articles

WikiProject class rating[edit]

This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as start, and the rating on other projects was brought up to start class. BetacommandBot 09:46, 10 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect[edit]

... from 2D-NMR is not very accurate as a 2D NMR experiment is not necessarily a Correlation experiment. Ideally we'd have an introductory page about general 2D principles and then pages on the individual techniques... ACH (talk) 17:11, 29 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Interpreting the COSY image data?[edit]

I'd like a little more information about the COSY-generated image. Looking at this, it appears that spots on the image can represent geometric relationships between neighboring atoms, but the details aren't too clear. What is "PPM" in this usage? It appears to be a frequency rather than a concentration (parts per million). If this kind of information is too elementary to have a place in the article, there might at least be pointers to *.edu websites where this stuff can be found. -- WillWare (talk) 13:37, 7 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

In terms of the ppm notation, those with a background understanding of NMR will know that you usually deal with chemical shift in ppm, and all spectra are recorded as such. I also doubt that anyone will be looking specifically for COSY experiments without having this kind of background. WCSpaz (talk) 12:16, 3 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

NOESY section[edit]

I think that NOESY shouldn't be considered as a sub-section of COSY, as they are completely different types of experiment. They should either both come under a heading of 2D NMR experiments, or NOESY should be discussed under its own page. WCSpaz (talk) 12:19, 3 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I just moved this article from Correlation spectroscopy to Two-dimensional nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy to better reflect the content. Seperate articles on COSY and NOESY etc. can be split off once there is more detailed content. Antony–22 (^talk⁄_contribs) 02:36, 6 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, Schraml splits NMR methods into "resolved" and "correlated" groups, and counts NOESY as a correlated method. It's just that the correlations are through-space instead of through-bond. Antony–22 (^talk⁄_contribs) 21:49, 1 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Heteronuclear single quantum coherence[edit]

HSQC (Heteronuclear single quantum coherence) is also a common 2D NMR technique, and should be included in the article — Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.198.80.252 (talk) 16:40, 8 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Indeed! Could you write a paragraph or two about it? Wikipedia thrives from reader contributions. DMacks (talk) 16:54, 8 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

DOSY NMR[edit]

Would the article benefit from a section on DOSY NMR? It's somewhat different than the other techniques, but in the end it's a 2D-technique, too.92.206.140.148 (talk)

Absolutely! Contributions are always welcome; please feel free to be bold and add a section, and if you have any questions I'll be happy to try to answer them. Antony–22 (^talk⁄_contribs) 17:18, 5 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (January 2018)[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Two-dimensional nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110927154532/http://www.chem.queensu.ca/facilities/nmr/nmr/webcourse/tocsy.htm to http://www.chem.queensu.ca/facilities/nmr/nmr/webcourse/tocsy.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:17, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]