Talk:Tropical Storm Vicente (2018)

Todo

Impact?? YE ^{Pacific Hurricane} 00:44, 25 October 2018 (UTC)

I will work on it tomorrow when I have time. Figfires^{Send me a message!} 03:41, 25 October 2018 (UTC)

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Tropical Storm Vicente (2018)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: JavaHurricane (talk · contribs) 15:57, 5 April 2020 (UTC)

Will do. -- JavaHurricane 15:57, 5 April 2020 (UTC)

I'm currently a bit busy. I've read through the article, and have found a few errors; otherwise, the article is pretty much a GA already. Will post my concerns shortly. Excellent work Noah! JavaHurricane 07:05, 6 April 2020 (UTC)

Status

Good Article

Criteria

• Well-written:

• the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct:

• it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation:

• Verifiable with no original research:

• it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:

• reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose):

• it contains no original research:

• it contains no copyright violations or plagiarism:

• Broad in its coverage:

• it addresses the main aspects of the topic:

• it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style):

• Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:

• Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:

• Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio:

• media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content:

• media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:

Comments

Here we go...

• Link to TCR in opening paragraph about "unusually small".

• I did say that the storm was small in the met so it isnt necessary to cite in the lead. Noah^Talk 16:37, 6 April 2020 (UTC)

  Hurricane Noah, Okay JavaHurricane 16:38, 6 April 2020 (UTC)

• Link to Hidalgos in second paragraph of lead links to "Hidalgo", not the Mexican state.

• Fixed. Noah^Talk 16:37, 6 April 2020 (UTC)

• "The storm left a total of 16 people dead throughout 2 states; 13 died in Oaxaca and 3 in Veracruz." I think you should replace the semicolon with a colon and remove the "died".

• Did this. Noah^Talk 16:37, 6 April 2020 (UTC)

• "The National Hurricane Center (NHC) first mentioned the system had the potential for tropical development early on October 19." Rephrase as "The NHC first began to monitor the system for potential..."

• As mentioned by others in the past, that would be construed as OR because the NHC did begin monitoring it much earlier. Noah^Talk 16:37, 6 April 2020 (UTC)

  Hurricane Noah, ah, I forgot that. JavaHurricane 16:38, 6 April 2020 (UTC)

And that's it. An excellently written article, and I think we can look forward to a FAC in the near future. Good job Noah! Keeping  On hold until the issues are resolved. -- JavaHurricane 16:28, 6 April 2020 (UTC)

@JavaHurricane: Should be it. Noah^Talk 16:37, 6 April 2020 (UTC)

Hurricane Noah, I think we are done here. now, passed. Congratulations! JavaHurricane 16:39, 6 April 2020 (UTC)

Though or ridge?

"...A deep-layer [[Trough (meteorology)|ridge]] located over the [[Gulf of Mexico]] and central Mexico..."

Anychance this is just a typo?--Jarodalien (talk) 10:33, 16 September 2020 (UTC)

"Originated from a tropical wave" in the first paragraph

This seems misleading; the first time I read it, I assumed it meant a literal wave (made of water), but from the link, it seems to just mean a moving area of low air pressure. Maybe "tropical atmospheric wave" would work? Anyone who doesn't hover over that term will probably get it wrong. Mrfoogles (talk) 04:55, 7 June 2023 (UTC)