Talk:Tropical Storm Agatha (1992)

Tropical Storm Agatha (1992) has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
August 7, 2011	Good article nominee	Listed

Weather: Tropical / Eastern Pacific Low‑importance

	Weather portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Weather, which collaborates on weather and related subjects on Wikipedia. To participate, help improve this article or visit the project page for details. Articles Requested Project Resources Become a Member Project Talk Assessment A-Class Alerts WeatherWikipedia:WikiProject WeatherTemplate:WikiProject WeatherWeather articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Tropical cyclones portal This article is supported by WikiProject Tropical cyclones (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by the Pacific hurricane work group (assessed as Low-importance).

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:Tropical Storm Agatha (1992)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Sp33dyphil ^{"Ad astra"} 08:20, 5 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

what's "10 direct"?
- It states that 10 people died from the hurricane directly, it is in most WP:WPTC articles.
"As it moved ~~northbound~~ northwards" northbound is an adjective, but we need an adverb.
- Done Y E ^Pacific ^Hurricane 04:02, 6 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
"Agatha ~~was~~ steered toward the north"
- Fixed. Y E ^Pacific ^Hurricane 04:02, 6 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
A bit picky, but I suggest "and ~~stayed~~ remained at sea"
FN 6, why's "National Hurricane Center" italicised while others above and below it aren't.
- Beause that ref is a template
"The center of the storm promptly became ill-defined on infrared satellite imagery" I don't get the "ill-defined on infrared satellite imagery" part.
- Changed to poorly. Y E ^Pacific ^Hurricane 04:02, 6 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Does "forecasters" need to be wikified?
- Why not? Y E ^Pacific ^Hurricane 04:02, 6 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
"heavy rains" redirects to a video game. I don't think it should be wikified at all, since it's not technical.
- Done. Y E ^Pacific ^Hurricane 04:02, 6 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
"Mexico" and "landfall" are wikified multiple times.
- I don' think they are in the same section. Y E ^Pacific ^Hurricane 04:02, 6 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
"Gased Times" should be formatted as The Gadsden Times.
- Done. Y E ^Pacific ^Hurricane 04:02, 6 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
"The News" should be italicised.
- Done. Y E ^Pacific ^Hurricane
date formatting should follow one style, either YMD or DMY.
- I made it in DMY to be consistent with other WP:EPAC articles. Y E ^Pacific ^Hurricane 04:02, 6 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Dablinks reveals two occurrences of dabs.
- Fixed the first and the second is project standards to have. Y E ^Pacific ^Hurricane 02:51, 7 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Assessment[edit]

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:
It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall:
Pass/Fail:

End note

No major problems. Very happy. Pass Sp33dyphil ^{"Ad astra"} 04:18, 7 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]