Talk:Triaenops menamena

Triaenops menamena is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so.

This article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on May 26, 2014.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
June 13, 2010	Good article nominee	Listed
July 16, 2010	Featured article candidate	Promoted

A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on June 6, 2010.

The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that one colony of the Madagascar bat Triaenops menamena contained an estimated 40,000 individuals?

Current status: Featured article

Africa: Madagascar Low‑importance

	Africa portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Africa, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Africa on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AfricaWikipedia:WikiProject AfricaTemplate:WikiProject AfricaAfrica articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Madagascar portal This article is supported by WikiProject Madagascar (assessed as Low-importance).

Mammals: Bats Low‑importance

	Mammals portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mammals, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of mammal-related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MammalsWikipedia:WikiProject MammalsTemplate:WikiProject Mammalsmammal articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Bats Task Force (assessed as Low-importance).

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:Triaenops menamena/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Jimfbleak - talk to me? 11:53, 13 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Just two comments

angular process is red-linked and unexplained
- Added a little explanation.
In the lead, you illustrate the sizes with wing lengths — I'd expect total length to be the more obvious figure, but I know nothing about bats.
- In bats, forearm length is among the most prominent measurements. I can also replace it with total length if needed, though; it's already in the table. Ucucha 13:39, 13 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Jimfbleak - talk to me? 11:53, 13 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for reviewing. Ucucha 13:39, 13 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for criteria)

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose): b (MoS):
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars etc.:
It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall:
Pass/Fail:

A featured article with no image?[edit]

I'm just wondering how this happened. Most featured articles have a header/main image of some sort. Like one of these. Dogman15 (talk) 09:48, 26 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A paper on echolocation calls...[edit]

...is available over there. If somebody (Ucucha ?) is interested :) Totodu74 (talk) 16:43, 2 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Feel free to reuse this edit on fr:WP.

@Ucucha: I translated "your" article on fr:WP, thanks a lot for this high-quality content! Totodu74 (talk) 14:31, 3 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Triaenops menamena. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110612095934/http://www.mnhn.fr/museum/front/medias/publication/15900_z08n3a10.pdf to http://www.mnhn.fr/museum/front/medias/publication/15900_z08n3a10.pdf
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090718195034/http://redpath-staff.mcgill.ca/Samonds/PDFS/11%20Samonds%202007.pdf to http://redpath-staff.mcgill.ca/Samonds/PDFS/11%20Samonds%202007.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:36, 20 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]