Talk:Trams in Norrköping

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled[edit]

The city's newest trams, the M06s (Flexity Classic) are bidirectional. 85.231.217.232 (talk) 22:58, 15 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks — I was wondering about that, but hadn’t been able to find a picture showing both sides clearly. David Arthur (talk) 00:06, 16 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The track plans I’ve seen don’t show any crossover points such as would be used by bidirectional trams. Have any been added, or are the Flexity Classics simply part of a sensible plan to gradually convert to bidirectional operation? David Arthur (talk) 02:07, 16 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Maybe the bidirectionality of the Flexity Classics was not a primary reasons why they chose that model. On the other hand, they will elongate one of their lines and that will probably be done section by section during many years ahead, and by now having birectional trams it will not be necessary to build a turning loop everytime a section is completed.

78.69.56.66 (talk) 23:05, 3 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (January 2018)[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Trams in Norrköping. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:01, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]