Talk:Tomb of Tutankhamun/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Merytat3n (talk · contribs) 10:33, 20 May 2022 (UTC)

I will review this over the next few days :) Merytat3n (talk) 10:33, 20 May 2022 (UTC)

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

   Very well written and formatted

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):

   Well-referenced with appropriate sources. Checked some citations of sources I have to hand - pages are correct etc. Earwig yields maximum of 13.8% which is totally fine - only so many ways to word things. Googling random phrases just returns this wiki page

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

   Well-focused and useful. No obvious gaps

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

   Balanced

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

   stable, no edit warring

6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

   Illustrated. Many images are appropriate given the contents are what the tomb is famous for

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

   Very well done!!! Thank you for all your hard work, it shows

Thank you for the opportunity to review this article! Merytat3n (talk) 10:01, 23 May 2022 (UTC)