Talk:Tom Holland

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Featured articleTom Holland is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so.
Main Page trophyThis article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on June 1, 2023.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
April 8, 2022Featured article candidatePromoted


Semi-protected edit request on 18 July 2023[edit]

Add that Tom Holland is engaged to zendaya 76.71.51.51 (talk) 20:09, 18 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. Also, please formulate your request in "change X to Y" format. Xan747 (talk) 20:15, 18 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 17 October 2023[edit]

Tom Holland is 5 ft 7 and a Half (171,5cm) he has said it himself on Ladbible Jacob Tommerup Clausen (talk) 16:39, 17 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. Paper9oll (🔔📝) 16:45, 17 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Filmography missing[edit]

There is no filmography 78.145.76.10 (talk) 13:51, 8 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

His filmography information is combined with his awards in the List of roles and awards of Tom Holland. Liu1126 (talk) 20:34, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 18 January 2024[edit]

Adding that Tom Holland is a supporter of USL Championship Team the Oakland Roots. Table19 (talk) 17:49, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. I'm also questioning how notable this piece of trivia is; compiling a long list of a person's likes and dislikes in their article isn't very helpful to the casual reader. Liu1126 (talk) 20:32, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Holland's 2019 views on film industry[edit]

I restored the 2019 views sourced to The Sunday Times, New Music Express, [1] etc. Contrary to the removing edit summary [2], I did not find that the content was a "set up to make the actor look bad"[*], or evidence that "his statements [...] were heavily misinterpreted". [*] If content makes the subject look bad, that is not in itself a just reason for removing it. signed, Willondon (talk) 18:16, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]