Talk:Three (2006 film)

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Horror

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Horror, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to fictional horror in film, literature and other media on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit one of the articles mentioned below, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.HorrorWikipedia:WikiProject HorrorTemplate:WikiProject Horrorhorror articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Film: Christian / American

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the Christian films task force.
	This article is supported by the American cinema task force.

Help with the info box please!

What? DVD release in 2002?[edit]

The wasn't finished 'til '03!--User:NFAN3|NFAN3 12:53, 12 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Adaptation?[edit]

Is it just me, or does it seem like someone actually made Donald Kaufman's script (titled in Adaptation. as The Three) into a movie? I know the movie is based on a novel, but that novel came out a year after Adaptation. Has anyone read the novel who can clarify if Adaptation. may indeed have been an inspiration?

I have not seen Adaptation, but I have read Thr3e, and from reading a little about Adaptation, the two stories don't seem similar at all.--Jonpro 05:34, 4 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No, the story of Adaptation. itself is not similar to that of Thr3e, but one of the characters in Adaptation. writes a screenplay that seems like it could resemble Thr3e. Do the three main characters in Thr3e end up being the same person?134.84.103.24 20:09, 5 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

{{spoilers}} Yes, they do.--Jonpro 19:15, 21 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have also seen Adaptation, and think that this similarity is disturbing. The 'cliche' film script in Adaptation is called "The Thr3e" and sounds almost exactly like Ted Dekker's book and film. 121.98.145.96 (talk) 05:02, 13 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Merger[edit]

I see no reason to have a section in Thr3e giving details of the movie when there is a separate article here.

Plot Description[edit]

This section is completely inadequate. A synopsis is generally included in an article about fiction. This page (and the one about the novel) read like the back of a dvd box.

We need to add would it wasn't like the book.--User:NFAN3|NFAN3 02:37, 11 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I plan on getting the movie when it's on DVD. If the plot isn't written by then, I'll do it. --Joseph M White 07:38, 12 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Synopsis ripped from IMDB?[edit]

I don't know whether this is against policy, but I just noticed that the plot synopsis here is almost word-for-word the Plot Summary from the IMDB page. SidShakal 04:20, 4 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Thr3eflim movie poster.JPG[edit]

Image:Thr3eflim movie poster.JPG is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 02:14, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Critical reception[edit]

Under Critical Reception, it reads, "The movie was slammed by mainstream movie critics in the days leading up to and after its January release," but the only source to corroborate this is a Rotten Tomatoes rating. Are there any other source (i.e. reviews from actual critics) that can be used here? Besides, I'm sure that not everyone thought it was aweful. Kristamaranatha (talk) 00:38, 16 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Move discussion in progress[edit]

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Thr3e which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 22:59, 24 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Three (2006 film). Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20131215161032/http://www.rottentomatoes.com/guides/worst_of_the_worst/2/ to http://www.rottentomatoes.com/guides/worst_of_the_worst/2//

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 12:43, 17 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]