Talk:The Unnatural (The X-Files)

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:The Unnatural (The X-Files)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Puffin (talk · contribs) 19:03, 5 December 2011 (UTC)

Rate	Attribute	Review Comment
1. Well-written:
	1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct.	One disambig link (In the Beginning) please fix it.
	1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation.	"Well known Dodgers radio announcer" Avoid the words "well known" It is a peacock term. "script over several months" This is too vague, how many months is "several months?" "very loosely based" Too vague, how loosely is "very loosely?" "very intimate understanding" Again too vague, please clarify. "very different kind of X-File" Too vague, please clarify.
2. Verifiable with no original research:
	2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline.	Ref 5: Needs publishing date. Ref 10: Be consistent if you are going to say "retreived" or "retreived on." (You should say retreived). Also, why is it in capitals?
	2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose).	"The name of the team, and that of the Alien ball player at the centre of the story, are very loosely based on a genuine Negro League team - The Homestead Grays and one of its players - Josh Gibson" Unsourced, please provide a citation. I would suggest putting citations in the infobox, so at a glance you can see sources for statements which are likely to be challenged.
	2c. it contains no original research.	See above.
3. Broad in its coverage:
	3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic.
	3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style).
	4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.
	5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.
6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio:
	6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content.	The image is due to be deleted on December 8, 2011, you need to sort this out.
	6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions.
	7. Overall assessment.	Fix this issues above and the article will pass. You fixed the issues, the article passes. Puffin Let's talk! 20:37, 5 December 2011 (UTC)

OK, I believe I've fixed all the issues you addressed. As for the picture, the text on the image page says "The previous version(s) of this image are non-free. [...] The current image will not be deleted, only its previous revisions," so I think it is OK! Also, as for the last two MoS complaints, they are part of a quote, so I really can't change them.--Gen. Quon (talk) 19:49, 5 December 2011 (UTC)

A-Class Assessment

Leave comments here for an A-Class assessment! Thanks.--Gen. Quon (Talk) 01:13, 20 September 2012 (UTC)

Update; please see Wikipedia:WikiProject The X-Files A-Class review/The Unnatural (The X-Files)/archive1. Thank you. TBrandley 03:12, 24 September 2012 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on The Unnatural (The X-Files). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120118173322/http://www.canada.com/vancouversun/news/arts/story.html?id=9b11fe77-0be1-445f-ae1f-f06571fba743 to http://www.canada.com/vancouversun/news/arts/story.html?id=9b11fe77-0be1-445f-ae1f-f06571fba743

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:52, 20 May 2017 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on The Unnatural (The X-Files). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130824063748/http://www.munchkyn.com/xf-rvws/unnatural.html to http://www.munchkyn.com/xf-rvws/unnatural.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:26, 18 June 2017 (UTC)

Actor's name: Frederic Lane

His last name is spelled Lehne (NOT Lane) which is how his Wikipedia entry reads. When I look at the source code here there are brackets around brackets with both Lehne and Lane. I was looking up the actor that appeared as the same name but different character Arthur Dales in 2 X-Files episodes: The Unnatural and The Travelers. I haven't looked at the entry for cast for The Travelers yet (I'll look there next.). I just noticed the discrepancy after looking up the actor's name as seen under "Information" from my cable box. Lbg13 (talk) 03:12, 17 August 2022 (UTC)

Good catch! I went ahead and switched it to "Fredric Lehne" throughout, since that's where his article is located.--Gen. Quon_[Talk]^{(I'm studying Wikipedia!)} 13:28, 17 August 2022 (UTC)

@Lbg13: Interestingly, IMDB notes that for his performances in The X-Files, he was credited as "Fredric Lane". That said, I still think it's best to just link directly to his article, which (imho) would cut down on any confusion.--Gen. Quon_[Talk]^{(I'm studying Wikipedia!)} 13:30, 17 August 2022 (UTC)