Talk:The Stuff of Thought

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate in the project, please visit its page, where you can join the project and discuss matters related to book articles. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the relevant guideline for the type of work.BooksWikipedia:WikiProject BooksTemplate:WikiProject BooksBook articles

Philosophy: Literature Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated task forces:
/
	Philosophical literature

Article created (October 2007)[edit]

Just created the article today. Article needs in depth explanation of Pinker's arguments contained within The Stuff of Thought and a section on criticism of the work. Dpetley 00:13, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I've read the book, would a paragraph or so on each chapter be appropriate? Thanks. Midorihana _(talk)_(contribs) 06:44, 17 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yes! I think that would be great. I've not finished the book and would defer to you if you'd like to add a summary of each chapter. Dpetley (talk) 13:22, 13 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Pinker delivered a good talk at Google that summarizes the book in about an hour. You can find it on Youtube. This would probably make a good basis for additional paragraphs illustrating how language reveals our internal physical model of the world. -- SpareSimian (talk) 22:35, 14 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:StevePinker.jpg Nominated for Deletion[edit]

An image used in this article, File:StevePinker.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests December 2011

What should I do?

Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.

If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 00:50, 12 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]