Talk:The National, Chicago

Architecture Mid‑importance

	Architecture portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Skyscrapers Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Skyscrapers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles that relate to skyscrapers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SkyscrapersWikipedia:WikiProject SkyscrapersTemplate:WikiProject SkyscrapersSkyscraper articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

To do[edit]

Here's what I believe remains to be done:

Add additional infobox building template parameters:
- Awards
- References
- Other miscellaneous parameters
Comply with geographical coordinates precision guidelines:
- Wikipedia:WikiProject_Geographical_coordinates#Precision_guidelines
Improve citations:
- Wikipedia:Citing_sources/Further_considerations
- Wikipedia:Citing_sources#Avoid_embedded_links
Add article to all relevant projects:
- Wikipedia:WikiProject#Finding_a_project
Check stub guidelines:
- Wikipedia:Stub
Improve article style:
Add content:
- References from official website press section
- Emporis and SkyscraperPage
- General Internet search
Draw attention to page:
- Help:Drawing_attention_to_new_pages
Address category issues:
- Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Skyscrapers#High-rise_building_categoriziation
- Category_talk:Burnham_and_Root_buildings#D._H._Burnham_&_Company

Squideshi (talk) 02:49, 10 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Unreliable sources maintenance tag[edit]

SounderBruce, thanks again for adding the unreliable sources maintenance tag. Which references do you believe are unreliable? The Emporis and SkyscraperPage references were added in accordance with guidance provided by WikiProject Skyscrapers. Is the issue more citations are needed? Squideshi (talk) 17:26, 10 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

SkyscraperPage is a user-generated database, and is thus wholly unreliable. Emporis is fine, but there needs to be non-database sources for an article like this, especially on an existing building. There's a few results from the Chicago Tribune that could be integrated in, or the historic registry from the city. Sounder Bruce 20:35, 10 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the clarification. I've raised your concern about SkyscraperPage in WikiProject Skyscrapers. I agree there need to be non-database sources, and I do plan to eventually add them (See my to do list above.) The Landmark Designation Report you shared is excellent. There are also links to a number of independent sources I plan to parse on the press section of the official website. Squideshi (talk) 20:56, 10 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]