Talk:The Holocaust History Project

	Judaism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Jewish history, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Jewish history on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Jewish historyWikipedia:WikiProject Jewish historyTemplate:WikiProject Jewish historyJewish history-related articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Death Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Death, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Death on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DeathWikipedia:WikiProject DeathTemplate:WikiProject DeathDeath articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

[Untitled][edit]

The article does not make clear if this is a notable organization - i.e., has it been cited, referred to, etc. Paul 14:35, 25 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

In fact, it has been cited in at least two books. The first is:

Robert Jan van Pelt, The Case for Auschwitz, Indiana University Press, 2002, pages 494-495, 498, 542

and the second is:

John Zimmerman, Holocaust Denial, University Press of America, 2000, pages viii, 142, 337, 358, 362, 363, 364, 386, 390

Gord 04:12, 8 June 2006 (UTC)

THHP is referenced in the peer-reviewed paper I contributed to, "The Ruins of the Gas Chambers: A Forensic Investigation of Crematoriums at Auschwitz I and Auschwitz-Birkenau," Daniel Keren, Jamie McCarthy and Harry W. Mazal, Holocaust and Genocide Studies, Vol. 18, No. 1 (Spring 2004), pp. 68-103. E.g. p. 68, "This study by members and associates of the Holocaust History Project..."

JamieMcCarthy 18:54, 8 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

THHP is also mentioned in the following paper:

Mathis, Andrew E. "General Semantics and Holocaust Denial." ETC: A Review of General Semantics 63.1 (2006): 52-61.

Also in:

Lipstadt, Deborah. History on Trial: My Day in Court with David Irving. New York: Ecco Press, 2005.

Trinkle, Dennis A., and Scott A. Merriman, eds. The History Highway 3.0: A Guide to Internet Resources. Armonk, N.Y.: M.E. Sharpe, 2002.

Sachs, Ruth. Adolf Eichmann: Engineer of Death. New York: Rosen Publishing, 2001.

Gilpatrick, Kristin. Destined to Live: The Incredible Story of WW II Airman "Wild Bill" Scanlon. Oregon, Wisc.: Badger Books, 2001.

Bayer, Linda N. Elie Wiesel: Spokesman for Remembrance. New York: Rosen Publishing, 2000.

Wallace, Max. The American Axis: Henry Ford, Charles Lindbergh, and the Rise of the Third Reich. New York: St. Martin's Press, 2003.

Lemons, Everette. The Third Reich, a Revolution of Ideological Inhumanity, Volume I: The Power of Perception. Morrisville, N.C.: Lulu Press, 2005.

Beyer, Mark. Emmanuel Ringelblum: Historian of the Warsaw Ghetto. New York: Rosen Publishing, 2001.

Ramen, Fred. Albert Speer: Hitler's Architect. New York: Rosen Publishing, 2001.

--153.104.2.20 18:42, 9 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I don't see why the page is described as: "This article lacks information on the importance of the subject matter". Surely the importance of the subject matter of the Holocaust and Holocaust denial is self evident. Gord 02:55, 11 July 2006 (UTC)

What gives THHP its special claim to credibility?[edit]

This is the question that I think was intended by user PaulHanson.

In the list of the members of THHP there is only one person, Gord McFee, with any training as an historian, and that is an M.A., which is no more than what Mark Weber of the IHR has. What is it about THHP that is supposed to make it so credible compared to the revisionists?

It is clearly an organization with an agenda.What makes THHP worthy of being cited as a source on Wikipedia while supposedly the IHR is not? -- Hadding

There is a certain arrogance in the words used to describe THHP's projects: "refutation" and "debunking." This amounts to asserting that what THHP has presented is unassailable, and it is not.

Why is there no [edit] button on that section of the article? On Wikipedia, the biased description of THHP is written in stone. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.35.154.221 (talk) 01:07, 3 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

We like to think it has to do with our not being a flock of idiots. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Aemathisphd (talk • contribs) 19:12, 15 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on The Holocaust History Project. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Corrected formatting/usage for http://holocaust-history.org/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 05:18, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]